Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
chanj0
User Rank
Author
re: Whatever happened to evolvable hardware?
chanj0   7/16/2012 4:05:38 PM
NO RATINGS
An evolvable hardware seems like a fantastic idea. Yet, it can be scary. A hardware is able to change itself to fit the environment seems like a mimic of human. With the help of neural network from the software world, an intelligent being made of metal and plastic will soon be built. Nonetheless, moving forward is an inevitable event. We just need to learn along the way and, be cautious and responsible of what we do.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Author
re: Whatever happened to evolvable hardware?
Duane Benson   7/16/2012 2:30:54 PM
NO RATINGS
I think Erebus is on the right track in terms of what happened with this. Conventional hardware has just advanced so rapidly that the need to adapt to newer and faster processors has kept ahead of the need to optimize. At some point, hardware may very well become so complex as to be unmanageable by humans. These advances may very well slow or stop and then optimization will be top priority. At that point, techniques like self-evolveable hardware will become viable and possibly even necessary.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
re: Whatever happened to evolvable hardware?
Peter Clarke   7/16/2012 9:08:15 AM
NO RATINGS
A "Friday-evening" glitch corrupted an earlier version of this article....caused by photo disappear, which i sure people would say was no great loss.. But i ended up reposting.

DrQuine
User Rank
Author
re: Whatever happened to evolvable hardware?
DrQuine   7/15/2012 9:54:47 PM
NO RATINGS
(there are three copies of this posting - all the comments will need to be merged into the final permanent version)

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Whatever happened to evolvable hardware?
KB3001   7/14/2012 9:39:06 AM
NO RATINGS
Whatever happened to all the posts that were here before? ;-)

EREBUS0
User Rank
Author
re: Whatever happened to evolvable hardware?
EREBUS0   7/13/2012 7:38:27 PM
NO RATINGS
I think the whole concept just was overcome by events. Regardless of the versatility of your evolvable technology, it just could not compete with the pace of standard component improvements. Look at the power you get each year and then think about holding hardware for five or ten years. It just doesn't make any sense and it is clearly not cost effective. It's like reuseable software. It's a great idea, but few people do it because of the rapid changes in language options and extensions. Just my opinion.



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...