Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
re: SLC vs MLC: Which works best for high-reliability applications?
elektryk321   7/23/2012 10:48:12 AM
I have a feeling that explanation of wear mechanism is little wrong. As far I know the problem is not with trapped electrons, electrons could be always moved with force (apropriate voltage) but each time when memory is programmed or erased, move of electrons degrades the isolation properties of oxider.

John Scaramuzzo
User Rank
re: SLC vs MLC: Which works best for high-reliability applications?
John Scaramuzzo   7/20/2012 9:50:55 PM
Charlie, really enjoyed reading your article here. The differences between SLC and MLC Flash have been a topic for discussion for quite some time and as a flash industry professional, we are constantly trying to mimic the advantages of SLC Flash in our MLC-based Solid State Drives. To add to your article, I would also like your readers to consider certain new endurance enhancement technologies that can substantially increase the native endurance and bolster reliability in MLC Flash devices. These types of innovations are blurring the lines between the SLC and MLC output and is making MLC a viable option for even the most write intensive application. Check out this white paper as a great resource for this type of technology on our website: -John Scaramuzzo, President, SMART Storage Systems

User Rank
re: SLC vs MLC: Which works best for high-reliability applications?
cdhmanning   7/18/2012 2:25:22 AM
Ok, maybe the answer is obvious to me because I have been working closely with NAND for the last 10 or so years...Clearly SLC has wider margins and can thus tolerate more degradation than MLC. Clearly SLC will give a huge reliability advantage. You can sometimes use MLC parts as if they were SLC parts. Many MLCs write two adjacent pages into the same cells, so if you only write every second page you can sometimes achieve SLC-like reliability in MLC. This opens up the possibility to do things like using MLC for the cost benefit, storing critical code etc in the fake-SLC area and less critical data/code in the regular MLC area. NAND is goofy stuff.For example most electronic parts tend to be more reliable at the lower end of their temperature range. NAND, OTOH, is often more prone to errors at lower temperatures. One failure mechanism you missed is read disturb. Yes, even reading NAND can corrupt data. That is particularly relevant to MLC. This has particular implications for static data like boot code which is typically not rewritten during the lifetime of the product but is read (and slowly corrupted) on every boot cycle. If you want to ensure that your NAND-based solutions are robust, ensure that the software you are using with it (file systems, boot loaders, etc) have mechanisms to mitigate against the bad side of NAND.

Kristin Lewotsky
User Rank
re: SLC vs MLC: Which works best for high-reliability applications?
Kristin Lewotsky   7/17/2012 11:39:09 PM
Good catch--that's what I get for focusing on the text of the article rather than the graphics. I communicated with the author and we are in the process of getting an updated version of the table. Look for a revised version by tomorrow morning. Thank you for your patience and apologies for any confusion.

User Rank
re: SLC vs MLC: Which works best for high-reliability applications?
S.Gilden   7/17/2012 2:44:44 PM
FYI: the table discribing the 3-bit MLC has tex errors and pattern "100" is listed twice. Further , pattern 001 is missing. Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...