Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 7   >   >>
Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: NYC to London on a 4,000 mph vacuum train
Bert22306   7/17/2012 12:51:24 AM
NO RATINGS
Sounds really cool. I had read about this sort of concept. And a less credible idea, but intriguing anyway, drilling straight down through the earth to the other side, and using only gravity to provide the needed acceleration and deceleration. Comment: 1g refers to acceleration rather than force. It's 9.8 meters/sec/sec, or 32 ft/sec/sec. It should take just over 3 minutes of constant 1g acceleration to reach 4000 mph (=5867 ft/sec), from a standing start. The force required to achieve that depends on the mass of these capsules. I would think that any small shift in the soil surrounding these tunnels would, uuh, really spoil your day, if you're a passenger.

NITESSH
User Rank
Rookie
re: NYC to London on a 4,000 mph vacuum train
NITESSH   7/17/2012 1:45:40 AM
NO RATINGS
i would like to ask:- "what is the problem in present design so that we can have a capsule that can accomodate just people" there is vaccum in tunnel we can have even a bigger capsule plz answer in basic terms as i am just a graduate student

NITESSH
User Rank
Rookie
re: NYC to London on a 4,000 mph vacuum train
NITESSH   7/17/2012 1:48:23 AM
NO RATINGS
i think with a big capsule problem will arise in magnetic levitation am i right and please elaborate i am not getting it clearly

MikeSB
User Rank
Rookie
re: NYC to London on a 4,000 mph vacuum train
MikeSB   7/17/2012 11:16:08 AM
NO RATINGS
This is obviously completely implausible. London's current Crossrail project is costing £1.5bn for 21km of tunnels. For a 4000 mile trans-Atlantic tunnel, that scales to £460bn ($720bn), and that doesn't even include making the tunnel vacuum sealed and the additional cost of building several kilometres under the sea. Adding the fact that maglev track is $40m/km gives an additional $260bn. This gives a $1tn total budget, which is significantly larger than the entire global air travel industry that it seeks to displace. I call snake oil on this. Also, the ET3 has been around since 2007; why is EETimes only reporting on it now?

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: NYC to London on a 4,000 mph vacuum train
KB3001   7/17/2012 11:27:05 AM
NO RATINGS
Not going to happen across the atlantic (the cost is astronomical). Perhaps within continents...

NewYankEE
User Rank
Rookie
re: NYC to London on a 4,000 mph vacuum train
NewYankEE   7/17/2012 12:34:21 PM
NO RATINGS
I'd be happy with a waterslide commute to work this morning ;-)

Hasmon
User Rank
Rookie
re: NYC to London on a 4,000 mph vacuum train
Hasmon   7/17/2012 2:36:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Why not use this within cities for high-speed package delivery...like they used to have in Paris 100 years ago? They used pneumatic pressure to zip letters along. This could be used to replace couriers, and it would be a lot safer delivering packages than trying it out on humans. It might even enable a proper e-commerce system...Imagine getting deliveries from amazon in an instant...actually wait--4000 mph is still too slow to cross the continent in less than one hour... For people, a tube built through the oceans would be the safest solution...earthquake proof and relatively safe from human interference. It could float a few dozen metres below the surface.

KB3001
User Rank
CEO
re: NYC to London on a 4,000 mph vacuum train
KB3001   7/17/2012 3:23:48 PM
NO RATINGS
"They used pneumatic pressure to zip letters along. " These systems are still used in banks/supermarkets nowadays to transfer cash, no?

S.Gilden
User Rank
Rookie
re: NYC to London on a 4,000 mph vacuum train
S.Gilden   7/17/2012 4:02:02 PM
NO RATINGS
OOPS, what if the is a small problem problem while YOU are mid-way under the Atlantic... perhaps a minor vacume leak, or a power outage at the vaccum source... or an electrial outage on the levatation system... hum, maybe you also consider the use of a straight shot frictionless "tube flight" system that claims to get you anywhere in the world in 44 minutes ?? from 2-A PRESS, Binghamton, N. Y. Thurs., March 24,1966 'Tube' Research Rensselaer —UP)— Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute plans a $70,000 research facility, Project Tube Flight, to study the feasibility of high speed, aboveground tubes for mass transportation. The U. S. Commerce Department granted the contract for the work.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: NYC to London on a 4,000 mph vacuum train
old account Frank Eory   7/17/2012 6:02:05 PM
NO RATINGS
A full working system up and running within a decade? Right, because the planet has infinite financial resources to fund such an adventure. "space travel on earth" seems like an appropriate description. All the costs (and more) and all the safety risks of space travel -- just to save a few hours relative to an old-fashioned jet aircraft.

Page 1 / 7   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).