Story was updated this morning after I spoke with Philippe Berge, senior director of NOR, PCM, e.MMC business for Micron's Wireless Solutions Group. Berge said Micron has previously had PCM in volume production at 90-nm. He also touted this latest announcement as proof of PCM's potential.
In a comment added to my piece published July 2010
a reader cited a quote from Samsung “…Memory for portable consumer devices today is at a major turning point as mobile applications increasingly require more diverse memory technology,” said Jun Dong-soo, an executive vice president at Samsung Electronics.
“The launch of our PRAM in an advanced MCP solution for the replacement of 40 nm-class and finer geometry NOR meets this need head-on,” he said...."
The results of that head-on collision may have some relevance to Micron as they proceed along what appears to be the same road. For the new PCM I assume and hope “availability” means the 1G-bit MCP is fully qualified and with an associated data sheet. The write/erase lifetime cited for this 1 G-bit 45nm MCP device is given as 100,000 cycles, whereas Micron’s prediction for w/e cycle lifetime at 45nm was 10E9 cycles. This was discussed in
All things being equal, it may be churlish to describe this is anything but PCM progress; representing a scaling holding point until, and if, the very difficult PCM scaling problems ever get solved. My view is unless Micron can in short order get a scaled 8G-bit PCM in the MCP or their Cube (or even a multi-chip based 8G-bit PCM) they will suffer the same fate as the Samsung MCP-PCM. So continuing the road analogy above we hope they have their seat belts on.
Dylan: Did Micron tell you how many of these 90nm devices in "volume production" were actually shipped and sold? More importantly how many product design- in wins were achieved?
"Proof of PCM's potential" I think PCM potential has been there for fifty years-for PCM realization of potential is the name of the game, with PCM devices that are competitive in price, performance and reliability.
What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.