Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
abraxalito
User Rank
Author
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
abraxalito   7/28/2012 1:29:21 PM
NO RATINGS
I have a question. Intel is the undisputed foundry leader - no doubt about that. So why would the world leader in foundry process need 'validation' for what it said from its followers?

cdhmanning
User Rank
Author
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
cdhmanning   7/27/2012 3:35:00 AM
NO RATINGS
I think "articles" like this are a sign of the times. Looks like EETimes is no longer really editing and is just becoming a low-quality channel for press releases and FUD-talk. The purpose of having an editorial is to keep the quality and screen out this sort of junk. Without that you're just cashing in a once-valuable brand. When the quality goes down, so will the advertising revenue. Oh well, once ESD stopped printing this was bound to happen...

Hillol
User Rank
Author
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
Hillol   7/26/2012 2:53:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes system is very key. In M2M or wireless, system performance is required. Process node can not solve all issues. HW+SW+Acceptance - that is market.

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
KB3001   7/25/2012 1:45:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Read what I said above. On its own transistor/process technology is not enough these days. ARM and Co. have low power architectures, more efficient software tools, and a much larger ecosystem, which can more than compensate for a loss of 30% in power or speed performance at the transistor level (if proven). Of course, they will always seek to catch up with the latest and best transistor/process technology but that's not all what they are about. I repeat, system performance is not dictated by transistor/process performance alone. Intel want you to think that way because they are an IDM who want you locked into their way of doing things.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
resistion   7/25/2012 1:20:46 AM
NO RATINGS
Intel's fins are like varying shape triangles (as pointed out in earlier articles). The leakage variation impact is clearer here: http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/david-manners-semiconductor-blog/2012/06/intels-finfets-are-complicated.html

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
resistion   7/25/2012 1:08:40 AM
NO RATINGS
About TSMC or foundries in general, they will never adopt new technologies unless it is clear customers will go for it. That is why they are not so "self-driven" as Intel or Samsung might be. That is why you need ARM or Qualcomm to first sign up. Even then, there is general reluctance. What if it is just one customer? Should other customers benefit so easily without putting in so much develop time? Etc.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
resistion   7/25/2012 1:03:52 AM
NO RATINGS
The Ivy Bridge advantage over Sandy Bridge is not 100% clear: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ivy-bridge-overclocking-core-i7-3770k,3198-5.html http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ivy-bridge-overclocking-core-i7-3770k,3198-3.html

vdara0
User Rank
Author
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
vdara0   7/25/2012 12:50:18 AM
NO RATINGS
So, why do ARM and TSMC bother to announce that they have FinFET in the roadmap? Since nobody cares it anyway.

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
KB3001   7/24/2012 8:57:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Yeah, but what about the overall system performance, power consumption, battery life, software and hardware eco-system? Neaaahh, who cares, it's FinFET technology after all :-)

askubel
User Rank
Author
re: Intel vindicated by TSMC/ARM announcement
askubel   7/24/2012 7:09:40 PM
NO RATINGS
You mean benefits like 30% less power consumption on average vs 32nm? I for one, applaud Intel for marketing the technology behind these benefits rather than just telling consumers "It's faster, so buy it"

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...