Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Brian Fuller2
User Rank
Author
re: Debating Olympic technology
Brian Fuller2   7/30/2012 4:32:58 PM
NO RATINGS
To amplify Junko's comment, where is the distinction between chemicals and mechanicals as performance-enhancing technologies? Why is one considered OK and the other not? Pistorius' blade technology is performance enhancing because he otherwise wouldn't be able to perform at this level. To take @Barry.Moss' comment further, perhaps there should be two tracks for athletes: technologically enhanced and not. And eventually consumers will decide whether, like McDonald's v. Farmer's Market fare, which we prefer.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Author
re: Debating Olympic technology
wilber_xbox   7/28/2012 4:18:19 PM
NO RATINGS
true, the test is for the humans and for technology.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
Author
re: Debating Olympic technology
wilber_xbox   7/28/2012 4:16:16 PM
NO RATINGS
I think that it is a great step ahead and thanks to technology that Oscar Pistorius is motivating a new crop of athletes but we should keep a check on the whether such technologies do not put anyone at unnecessary advantage.

Barry.Moss
User Rank
Author
re: Debating Olympic technology
Barry.Moss   7/26/2012 5:35:21 PM
NO RATINGS
In the extreme, surgical alterations and advanced prosthetic could come to dominate the game. Imagine a future where a "six million dollar" bionic man could complete. It's not hard to conceive of a time where technology trumps the best trained natural body.

nicolas.mokhoff
User Rank
Author
re: Debating Olympic technology
nicolas.mokhoff   7/26/2012 4:51:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Neither technology nor chemicals supported the competitors in the past; at least it wasn't so prevalent. It was supposed to be all about "fun and games" and may the best sports person win. It is shameful how commercialized and "do anything to win" is guiding today's sports, whether in the Olympics or on the local basketball court. It sure ain't your father's Olympics anymore: http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/07/26/12932649-millionaire-medalists-will-london-2012-remain-true-to-olympic-spirit?lite

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: Debating Olympic technology
junko.yoshida   7/26/2012 4:30:11 PM
NO RATINGS
This is mind-boggling. Where do you draw the line? But as George mentioned, better to rely on technology than chemicals... But still...

george.leopold
User Rank
Author
re: Debating Olympic technology
george.leopold   7/26/2012 2:43:19 PM
NO RATINGS
The "Science Friday" audio we linked to also mentions that the water temperature in the Olympic pools could be raised to speed up ALL swimmers.

elektryk321
User Rank
Author
re: Debating Olympic technology
elektryk321   7/26/2012 10:20:31 AM
NO RATINGS
Not in future, they are using this right now. Look at the swimsuits or shoes. Even if the technical upgrades will be banned there are other possibilities. I heard that cyclists take some kind of chirurgical operations to straighten the blood veins for better oxygen transportation for muscles. I believe in future the number of possible body modification will be bigger.

elctrnx_lyf
User Rank
Author
re: Debating Olympic technology
elctrnx_lyf   7/26/2012 6:16:39 AM
NO RATINGS
Does it really mean all athletes would be looking at some sort of technology help in the future?

Sanjib.A
User Rank
Author
re: Debating Olympic technology
Sanjib.A   7/26/2012 3:21:02 AM
NO RATINGS
I think it's not only the technology (carbon-fiber legs), but also the tremendous self-confidence or inner strength, whatever you may call it as, has made it possible for Oscar Pistorius to overcome the challenges. Taking advantage of technologies in sports is good, only if, it is affordable and available to all participants around the world...otherwise it doesn't make sense. Thanks for sharing the audio link! It was a great discussion and enjoyed learning many new technology trends in the sports.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...