Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
bogdanbmcc
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple v Samsung: Rights and Wrongs
bogdanbmcc   2/1/2013 10:25:32 PM
NO RATINGS
The concept of a tablet and most of its features is not new, it is not an innovation, etc etc.. Do we suffer from amnesia? Anyone remember PDAs? The concept was there, what we lacked was all kinds of technology improvements to make it really useful, sufficiently powerful and cool. Apple has all the right to copyright/patent a particular shape/color etc as Industrial Design did and does, but to patent "a rounded rectangle"?! Give me a break!

bogdanbmcc
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple v Samsung: Rights and Wrongs
bogdanbmcc   2/1/2013 10:21:11 PM
NO RATINGS
They already did (numerous times). They just don't sell it abroad, but so what, they have their internal market big enough ... So far we have very limited success in dealing with that angle of the problem. The solution for it will NOT come from us.

Daryl.H
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple v Samsung: Rights and Wrongs
Daryl.H   8/13/2012 1:06:02 PM
NO RATINGS
When a company has to turn to its patent attorney’s to protect its competitive advantage utilizing bogus claims in ridiculous patents it’s time to look to another leader. Apple has to realize it’s time to market and its marketing that made the product. Finally a big boy got up and said enough already.

escher
User Rank
Manager
re: Apple v Samsung: Rights and Wrongs
escher   8/9/2012 11:23:08 AM
NO RATINGS
The patent system is indeed broken. Big coorporations build up or buy (Google) large volumes of IP, which is used as ammunition in suits and countersuits against their competition, and to shut down disruptive innovation by small companies. The end customer is the biggest loser, and the biggest winners are the lawyers and executives of the corporatocracy.

Streetrodder
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple v Samsung: Rights and Wrongs
Streetrodder   8/8/2012 4:54:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Perhaps they're waiting on the side, waiting for all the evidence to be shared. They get a lot more info for free, and can use it for their own cases. Kind of giving Apple and Samsung 'enough rope'?

selinz
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple v Samsung: Rights and Wrongs
selinz   8/7/2012 8:28:25 PM
NO RATINGS
I'd like to know where Microsoft and Motorola (google) are in this since those two companies really have a mountain of IP and prior art to defend themselves with.

markhahn0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple v Samsung: Rights and Wrongs
markhahn0   8/7/2012 6:21:39 PM
NO RATINGS
patents are supposed to encourage, not stifle competition. we (people acting through government) created all forms of IP as a purely artificial mechanism to encourage progress. Apple is one of the finest examples of how to *abuse* IP - how to use patents to maximize profits by minimizing competition. we need to reduce the domain of valid IP protection, and greatly narrow the definition of infringement. Apple has made a mockery of the IP system as it stands today. especially in light of the realities of industrial supply-chain management: no one could possibly clone an Apple product because Apple does a very good job of squeezing out efficiencies of scale, of locking up industrial capacity. remember that none of the parts in Apple products are somehow uniquely Apple - even the CPU is just a SoC built from commodity blocks.

askubel
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple v Samsung: Rights and Wrongs
askubel   8/7/2012 7:47:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Changing process technologies isn't as simple as checking the "32nm" box instead of the 45nm" box. There would be a non-trivial amount of design and testing for Apple to move their A5X to the 32nm process. But even if we assume it was an option from the start, then the other problem is the delay. To advance a deadline for such a large project as deploying a new process technology by 2.5 months would be challenging if not impossible. Time is easily converted to money, but the converse is not always true. So with that in mind, rather than be gated by Samsung's deployment of 32nm, they went with the tried-and-true 45nm process from the start. Can't say it turned out poorly for them.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
re: Apple v Samsung: Rights and Wrongs
mcgrathdylan   8/7/2012 5:53:34 AM
NO RATINGS
I think we can all agree that its wrong for someone to blatantly steal and profit from the innovations of others. From a fundamental fairness perspective, that's just not right. But at the same time, in every business in the world, competitors size up the leader and try to take them down, often times trying to take a page from the leaders book and learn from its success. This business of a patent on the rectangle is ridiculous. I appreciate your commentary, Rick. And I wish I knew what the solution should be.

Stanley_
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple v Samsung: Rights and Wrongs
Stanley_   8/7/2012 5:09:47 AM
NO RATINGS
people honestly really buy samsung phone thinking that it's apple phone.. really? people really so stupid? I saw all samsung phones have samsung logo on front face... for reasonable min iq person, there is zero chance it gets confused.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Most Recent Comments
perl_geek
 
AZskibum
 
AZskibum
 
AZskibum
 
AZskibum
 
mhrackin
 
DrQuine
 
R_Colin_Johnson
 
R_Colin_Johnson
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
11 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
14 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).