Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 6   >   >>
spoli
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is emulating a product the same as stealing?
spoli   8/9/2012 7:47:54 PM
NO RATINGS
But we learned so much from those little 3-ring binders. A lot of engineers (including many from Apple) have been studied these documents and became eventually better engineers. I bet there are a few that started their careers trying to build their own PC's based on those 3-ring binders! I was definitely one - the whole experience shaped my career and, even I did not end building PCs, I feel that I own something to IBM's decision to make it public. Apple didn't do the same: their closed approach, while profitable at first, almost destroyed them as a business before the iPhones and iPads. It will eventually happen the same now. Maybe not Samsung, maybe not HTC, maybe not ASUS or others but the competition will cut their profits sooner or later the same way PC's in the past almost reduced Macs to a niche market for the wealthy and the snobs. Smartphones shaped like rectangles with touch and voice technology are here to stay despite the legal battles between Apple and the rest of the world that tries to catch up. And this is good and healthy: it will force Apple to reinvent themselves every few years or slip into oblivion. Thank you IBM!

spoli
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is emulating a product the same as stealing?
spoli   8/9/2012 7:24:08 PM
NO RATINGS
I couldn't agree more! "Give me enough money and resources and I'll hire a lawyer to prove that you infringed some of my IP". That's why big companies with deep pockets look like bullies. What we see happening with Apple and Samsung is a battle between two thugs while we (the customers) are just spectators taking sides in the same divisive ways as our political fights shaped our psyche. I found the following article very intriguing: http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/no-copyright-law-the-real-reason-for-germany-s-industrial-expansion-a-710976.html Excerpt: "Did Germany experience rapid industrial expansion in the 19th century due to an absence of copyright law? A German historian argues that the massive proliferation of books, and thus knowledge, laid the foundation for the country's industrial might." It's time to learn something from our past... and something from our present (see the open source movement).

pmoyle111
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is emulating a product the same as stealing?
pmoyle111   8/9/2012 6:48:00 PM
NO RATINGS
back in the day boards that plugged into an ibm also plugged into a competitor such as compaq if the competitor thought fit, and there were no license fees or royalties reqiured. Meanwhile, the same was not true with the apple II. Nor the Lisa, nor Mac. Apple was fairly quickly relegated to a cadre of users that drank the koolaid or graphics (which was a near 100% intersection of sets anyway). When ibm came out with the PS2 and attempted to pull the same shenanigans, they were pushed out by the "gang of 9". ibm's success was it's open architecture. At the end of the day, a company that succeeds by innovating does not need the lawyers. lawyers are a large part of what is wrong with america today and if we could remove about 80% of them, consumers would benefit immensely, not only in choice of selection, but also in price.

rangecheck
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is emulating a product the same as stealing?
rangecheck   8/9/2012 6:41:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Apple needs this "trade dress" argument to succeed when it fail with M$. It is a way to get to Google who is, by market share, cornering the market. Not going to work here either but it is worth a try. Apple makes some great products but they have done themselves a disservice by bringing this silly law suit. Backlash is gonna hurt. Now, that is not to say that this biased and ill prepaired judge can't make it go to Apple in the short term.

jeffreyrdiamond
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is emulating a product the same as stealing?
jeffreyrdiamond   8/9/2012 6:08:34 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a common myth. Apple actually paid Xerox $5 million dollars in Apple stock for the right to use their GUI. The stock value exploded, netting Xerox far more money from the sale than they ever made selling their own computers.

SPLatMan
User Rank
Manager
re: Is emulating a product the same as stealing?
SPLatMan   8/9/2012 1:04:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Yes

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is emulating a product the same as stealing?
t.alex   8/9/2012 5:09:10 AM
NO RATINGS
For OS or sofware it might be a different story. There is license involved for every piece of software. Apple might have built osx and iOS on top of some unix kernel but it does not violate the license though. This is similar to google building android on top of Linux kernel.

Stephan Kinsella
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is emulating a product the same as stealing?
Stephan Kinsella   8/8/2012 10:37:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Gordon: I gave a link earlier (www.c4sif.org/resources) if you are really interested in looking into this. "As you should well know, a patent is an award from a country for willfully disclosing to the world what one has discovered so that others can then study and build upon that innovation. If one is not granted a patent, why would one ever disclose to the world what they have discovered?" Well, if you want to keep something private, that's your right. But if your goal is to make a profit, you will have to publicly reveal information as part of selling a product or service. If it is successful this sends a market signal to others to compete with you to capture the profit. This is called the "free market." I realize patent advocates hate the idea of unbridled competition and the free market, but some of us are in favor of justice, property rights, competition, and the free market.

res213
User Rank
Rookie
re: Is emulating a product the same as stealing?
res213   8/8/2012 8:00:05 PM
NO RATINGS
'Good engineers create, great engineers copy' Or so I've been told.

jaybus0
User Rank
CEO
re: Is emulating a product the same as stealing?
jaybus0   8/8/2012 7:07:40 PM
NO RATINGS
I do not disagree with the prior art argument against the validity of the shape patent. However, I think the answer is simpler than that. An invention has to be novel and not obvious to others skilled in the same field. All LCD screens that might possibly be used in a handheld device are rectangular. What other shape for a phone could possibly be more obvious than a rectangle slightly larger than the rectangular LCD screen it must by force use? I don't think one need even be skilled in the art to see that as obvious. It may well be the most obvious thing that has ever been filed for, and certainly the most obvious that has had a patent actually granted. Even the Microsoft button push patent is less obvious.

<<   <   Page 2 / 6   >   >>


Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
<b><a href=Betajet">

The Circle – The Future's Imperfect in the Present Tense
Betajet
5 comments
The Circle, a satirical, dystopian novel published in 2013 by San Francisco-based writer Dave Eggers, is about a large, very powerful technology company that combines aspects of Google, ...

Max Maxfield

Recommended Reads From the Engineer's Bookshelf
Max Maxfield
25 comments
I'm not sure if I read more than most folks or not, but I do I know that I spend quite a lot of time reading. I hate to be idle, so I always have a book or two somewhere about my person -- ...

Martin Rowe

Make This Engineering Museum a Reality
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
Vincent Valentine is a man on a mission. He wants to make the first house to ever have a telephone into a telephone museum. Without help, it may not happen.

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
16 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...