Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
t.alex   8/11/2012 5:58:06 AM
NO RATINGS
I understand it is usually company policy not country law.

_hm
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
_hm   8/11/2012 12:09:49 AM
NO RATINGS
The gist of story is one has to be very careful in writing emails. Email needs to be stored for around three to five years by law.

Simiyon
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
Simiyon   8/10/2012 11:20:41 PM
NO RATINGS
I thought LG Prada also called as KE850 was sold in the USA. So how come it's not considered prior art. I searched the net and came with this comparison done against the Prada when Iphone first came out. http://www.roughlydrafted.com/RD/RDM.Tech.Q1.07/72B08E9A-D467-45EA-B214-28D3A340C3E5.html Also, it most probably was available through Amazon in the USA.

elPresidente
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
elPresidente   8/10/2012 10:08:10 PM
NO RATINGS
I never would have thought, for the briefest moment, that the words 'may" and "could" were in Jobs' vocabulary. So it appears to me that Jobs could have been insecure, hiding behind intimidation - this may make sense to me now.

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
Bert22306   8/10/2012 9:30:34 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm with Dylan. This proves what everyone already knew. Companies always study each others' products in the greatest detail. As to copying patented features, I've yet to see what features of the ones mentioned so far could be construed as credibly patented. This is a matter of when technology reaches a certain stage, a flurry of new products can emerge, and they do. Certainly we saw this happening with the single-chip computer, with digital image compression, and countless other examples from the Industrial Revolution to today. Almost like a floodgate opens up, when a key invention is made. Apple cannot credibly prevent progress.

Eric Verhulst_Altreonic
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
Eric Verhulst_Altreonic   8/10/2012 8:47:06 PM
NO RATINGS
This will the most ridiculous lawsuit of the century, if it wouldn't be happening. Apple's great competitive position is only due to good design and good marketing. The technology itself comes from others (e.g. Samsung in Korea). Even the assembly is done in China. Get real!

t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
t.alex   8/10/2012 6:31:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting reading. This reminds us to write less emails at work :)

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
rick merritt   8/10/2012 4:00:21 PM
NO RATINGS
The emails are interesting but not core to the case, IMHO. They establish industry practice is to examine in great detail competing products. The emails do not speak directly to whether Samsung copied Apple's patented technologies.

klsxgo90
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
klsxgo90   8/10/2012 3:11:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Would love to be a juror on this one. I know I'm not seeing the whole picture just from these selected emails in this article, but what I see so far is not convincing of either side's case. Also, the timeline is unclear from the dates of these emails. Who allegedly copied who, and when?

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
mcgrathdylan   8/10/2012 7:38:50 AM
NO RATINGS
Great reading. Shows what everyone knew all along: both companies benchmark and evaluate other products and ask themselves what they can do to incorporate and build on the features and capabilities they find. I am no lawyer or judge, but I would argue that the Jobs email is the most damming of all.

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Overview: Battle-hardened veterans of the electronics industry have heard of the “connected car” so often that they assume it’s a done deal. But do we really know what it takes to get a car connected and what its future entails? Join EE Times editor Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of movers and shakers in the connected car business. Executives from Cisco, Siemens and NXP will share ideas, plans and hopes for connected cars and their future. After the first 30 minutes of the radio show, our listeners will have the opportunity to ask questions via live online chat.
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...