Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
t.alex   8/11/2012 5:58:06 AM
NO RATINGS
I understand it is usually company policy not country law.

_hm
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
_hm   8/11/2012 12:09:49 AM
NO RATINGS
The gist of story is one has to be very careful in writing emails. Email needs to be stored for around three to five years by law.

Simiyon
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
Simiyon   8/10/2012 11:20:41 PM
NO RATINGS
I thought LG Prada also called as KE850 was sold in the USA. So how come it's not considered prior art. I searched the net and came with this comparison done against the Prada when Iphone first came out. http://www.roughlydrafted.com/RD/RDM.Tech.Q1.07/72B08E9A-D467-45EA-B214-28D3A340C3E5.html Also, it most probably was available through Amazon in the USA.

elPresidente
User Rank
Freelancer
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
elPresidente   8/10/2012 10:08:10 PM
NO RATINGS
I never would have thought, for the briefest moment, that the words 'may" and "could" were in Jobs' vocabulary. So it appears to me that Jobs could have been insecure, hiding behind intimidation - this may make sense to me now.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
Bert22306   8/10/2012 9:30:34 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm with Dylan. This proves what everyone already knew. Companies always study each others' products in the greatest detail. As to copying patented features, I've yet to see what features of the ones mentioned so far could be construed as credibly patented. This is a matter of when technology reaches a certain stage, a flurry of new products can emerge, and they do. Certainly we saw this happening with the single-chip computer, with digital image compression, and countless other examples from the Industrial Revolution to today. Almost like a floodgate opens up, when a key invention is made. Apple cannot credibly prevent progress.

Eric Verhulst_Altreonic
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
Eric Verhulst_Altreonic   8/10/2012 8:47:06 PM
NO RATINGS
This will the most ridiculous lawsuit of the century, if it wouldn't be happening. Apple's great competitive position is only due to good design and good marketing. The technology itself comes from others (e.g. Samsung in Korea). Even the assembly is done in China. Get real!

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
t.alex   8/10/2012 6:31:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Interesting reading. This reminds us to write less emails at work :)

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
rick merritt   8/10/2012 4:00:21 PM
NO RATINGS
The emails are interesting but not core to the case, IMHO. They establish industry practice is to examine in great detail competing products. The emails do not speak directly to whether Samsung copied Apple's patented technologies.

klsxgo90
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
klsxgo90   8/10/2012 3:11:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Would love to be a juror on this one. I know I'm not seeing the whole picture just from these selected emails in this article, but what I see so far is not convincing of either side's case. Also, the timeline is unclear from the dates of these emails. Who allegedly copied who, and when?

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
mcgrathdylan   8/10/2012 7:38:50 AM
NO RATINGS
Great reading. Shows what everyone knew all along: both companies benchmark and evaluate other products and ask themselves what they can do to incorporate and build on the features and capabilities they find. I am no lawyer or judge, but I would argue that the Jobs email is the most damming of all.

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).