Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
Nando Basile
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
Nando Basile   8/20/2012 9:34:51 AM
NO RATINGS
I share this point 100%. All companies serve customers. What every customer does before purchasing is comparing. Being competitive ''literally'' requires to know what competition is doing. Competitive and reverse analysis are necessary, any big company does it, this is one major task of any marketing department. To make a counter example, Nokia overlooked competition in 2009 and you see how it ended. I don't see how these sort of e-mails can seriously stand a trial about particular patent infringement.

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
Sheetal.Pandey   8/19/2012 12:53:10 PM
NO RATINGS
I guess its the competitive strategy to know your opponents strengths and weakness. After all everything is fare in war and it seems to be a big war to be at number 1 position.

t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
t.alex   8/15/2012 4:35:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Is the competitor AMD :) just random guess

bmonk
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
bmonk   8/12/2012 5:08:28 PM
NO RATINGS
When I was interviewed at Intel in the 80's, one of the manager said they reversed the graphic design of fellow competitors but they could never master it.

eewiz
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
eewiz   8/12/2012 1:59:07 AM
NO RATINGS
Haha. This is interesting. So get an attorney to sit in the meeting to avoid discovery!

t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
t.alex   8/12/2012 1:22:38 AM
NO RATINGS
Really ? Why would it be privileged if there is an attorney sitting in?

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
rick merritt   8/12/2012 12:34:41 AM
NO RATINGS
Someone told me recently some companies are having an attorney staff every major meeting so it can be considered privileged communications and exempt from discovery. Anyone else heard of such practices?

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
rick merritt   8/12/2012 12:31:52 AM
NO RATINGS
It is my understanding that in the current case the LG Prada handset is not being considered as prior art at least in part because it was not sold or marketed in the U.S. prior to the launch of the iPhone. Any patent experts here can feel free to clarify the law.

eewiz
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
eewiz   8/11/2012 12:50:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Yup. Infact one IP expert advised me always talk important stuff over the phone and leave no records/emails for anyone to findout.

Etmax
User Rank
Author
re: Apple vs. Samsung: Reading Steve Jobs' emails
Etmax   8/11/2012 12:49:05 PM
NO RATINGS
I once worked for a major US electronics manufacturer and they had a whole department dedicated to the reverse engineering of competitor's products. They went as far as using an E-beam prober to read out the contents of protected EEPROM. They didn't copy the code, just use it for understanding benchmark results. I'm sure they weren't alone. Regarding prior art overseas, I would be very surprised if they could patent a a foreign invention overlooking foreign prior art. If they could then there would be very little stopping a foreign country from discounting any US IP rights overseas.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...