Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
tb1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Bluetooth, and how it almost didnít happen
tb1   8/22/2012 7:40:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Bluetooth is not almost dead. My sister works in sales, and her job depends on having a Bluetooth receiver in her ear at all times so she can multitask talking to clients with getting data from a computer (or, unfortunately, driving). I'm guessing that's true for most in sales, marketing, or any job that relies on constant contact with people. 'Almost dead' implies it is going away. I think you'd have a riot from these people if they even had an inkling that such a thing was going to happen. She also uses Bluetooth to wirelessly (and seamlessly) connect an iPad to a powered stereo speaker. Later revs of Bluetooth, which new phones are starting to implement, allow faster data connections.

elektryk321
User Rank
Rookie
re: Bluetooth, and how it almost didnít happen
elektryk321   8/16/2012 9:37:23 AM
NO RATINGS
Bluetooth is almost dead technology, look at the new smartphones, they lack of many Bluetooth features like IP over bluetooth, file transfer or simple serial port. 5 years ago, almost all smartphones and palptops had support for plenty of bluetooth protocols, now only headphone is supported. Do you remember IRDA protocol/interface? Bluetooth sooner or later will divide its fate, at least in consumer market.

Python
User Rank
Rookie
re: Bluetooth, and how it almost didnít happen
Python   8/15/2012 6:27:59 AM
NO RATINGS
How do you forcast the future of Bluetooth Low Energy ? This technology is very nice for low power portable devices connected to mobile phones but Apple is rather slow to enable all the APIs and Samsung/Android Galaxy S III suffers from some bugs. It seems that they have not tested the system before to launch it on the market.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Bluetooth, and how it almost didnít happen
Bert22306   8/15/2012 12:00:43 AM
NO RATINGS
True. The WWW succeded in making (initially) PCs desirable for the common joe, and PC sales took off after 1994, as a result. My point is that for innovations to continue to happen, the RANZ model has to generate some kind of reward. Zero royalties is great, but the scheme still has to be self sustaining. That's how the IETF and to a lesser extent the IEEE work as well. The companies involved invest their talent in the efforts of these organizations, but they will only do so with some payoff in sight. Just getting a lot of devices to use a new standard won't matter a hill of beans, if there isn't any upside to those who invested in creating it. You don't get something for nothing.

HDuncan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Bluetooth, and how it almost didnít happen
HDuncan   8/14/2012 11:21:23 PM
NO RATINGS
By that definition the World Wide Web has not been a success, since Tim Berners-Lee received no direct remuneration from it! There's much more to success than just money... The success of Bluetooth is that it's become a universal standard, despite (or maybe because of) the fact that no-one owns it.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Bluetooth, and how it almost didnít happen
old account Frank Eory   8/14/2012 10:15:53 PM
NO RATINGS
That's a great story about how the name was chosen! It is a wonder that anyone can come up with a clever new name for a standard, a company or a brand anymore. Lawyers need to do trademark searches, and a proposed name needs to be translated into dozens of different languages to catch unintended meanings or connotations. But for certain purposes, an uninspired name-choosing methodology can also work. Intel's project code names are geographic locations -- presumably because those won't be trademarked. And in the IT world, computer host names are now usually just semi-meaningless alphanumeric sequences, while in the good old days our Unix computers were named after the Greek gods, great beers of the world, rock bands, and a plethora of other interesting themes.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: Bluetooth, and how it almost didnít happen
Bert22306   8/14/2012 8:06:27 PM
NO RATINGS
A bit of a strange way of gauging "success," I guess, since the developers get no direct compensation for their design efforts. The RANDZ model bets on revenues achieved from the increased sale of products that make use of Bluetooth, such as cell phones and automobile audio systems. So I would think that "success" of Bluetooth should be measured on the basis of increased volume and/or increased revenues from those other industries, which have adopted Bluetooth.



Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

MSGEQ7-Based DIY Audio Spectrum Analyzer: Testing
Max Maxfield
12 comments
In my previous column on this topic, we discussed the step-by-step construction of the first pass at a MSGEQ7-based DIY audio spectrum analyzer for use in my BADASS Display project. Of ...

Karen Field

June 2014 Cartoon Caption Winner
Karen Field
13 comments
Congratulations to "Wnderer" for submitting the winning caption for our June cartoon, after much heated conversation by our judges, given the plethora of great entries.

Jeremy Cook

Inspection Rejection: Why More Is Less in a Vision System
Jeremy Cook
3 comments
Albert Einstein has been quoted as saying, "Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler." I would never claim to have his level of insight -- or such an awesome head of ...

Jeremy Cook

Machine Fixes That Made Me Go 'DUH!'
Jeremy Cook
21 comments
As you can see in my bio at the end of this article, I work as a manufacturing engineer. One of my favorite things that happens on a Friday late in the afternoon is to hear my phone ring ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)