Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
dblaza1
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
dblaza1   8/26/2012 6:29:13 PM
NO RATINGS
These kind of polls can be controversial but the benefit to EETimes.com readers is the editors are looking at this data every day and get to interview the CEO's of major companies so they have a perspective on the industry that even the Wall Street Journal doesn't. If one of your suppliers has closed a fab, is losing money or has had management turnover wouldn't you like to know?

Navelpluis
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
Navelpluis   8/24/2012 6:08:20 AM
NO RATINGS
Craig, you have a good point here, but I doubt it. Fortunately most engineers are bright in their thoughts and decisions: 1) Comparing NxP with Qualcomm is 'apples and eggs'. These companies do not have much shared markets out there. Engineers know this more often than one might expect. But hey, name me the quantity of engineers working with Qualcomm v.s. NxP? Is it a 1:1000 ? 2) I have a strong feeling that most engineers that filled in the poll are positioned in the US.

CraigL
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
CraigL   8/21/2012 12:29:29 AM
NO RATINGS
Hasn't EE Times just contributed to the demise of these companies by conducting the poll... surely designers who read this are going to avoid selecting components from those companies not expected to be around in a few years time, especially if those designers work on products with long life cycles?

t.alex
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
t.alex   8/19/2012 3:29:05 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree with the thumbs down results, but it would not be so soon before they go out of business.

Brian Fuller2
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
Brian Fuller2   8/17/2012 3:25:17 AM
NO RATINGS
For @krh and @Robotics Developer: help us refine the methodology. Perhaps the core question is not "which companies will be around" but something designed to assess your confidence level in various suppliers (not unlike consumer confidence surveys). Or maybe it's a rating system that gauges your experience in 4-5 areas (returns, tech service, product breadth etc.). Again, I'm trying to strike a balance between yielding a relevant, sound confidence report and not forcing readers to spend 30 minutes checking off boxes on the form. Your input (as was the case for last year's quality survey) will be HUGE!

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
Robotics Developer   8/17/2012 12:37:02 AM
NO RATINGS
I would think that EE Times readership would be a good place as any to take the pulse of the marketplace. I am not sure that we the readers can predict with great certainty whether a company will or will not be around in 5 years, but perceptions are very important. Would you design in a device from a company that you felt was not going to be around for long?

krh
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
krh   8/16/2012 1:44:37 AM
NO RATINGS
Please define what is meant by "foreign IC suppliers". This seems like a swimsuit competition, with a hard qualifier to know what they will look like in 5 years. Seriously, what are the qualifications for the judges...???

Brian Fuller2
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon Valley Nation: Top 5 doomed IC companies
Brian Fuller2   8/15/2012 5:25:04 PM
NO RATINGS
We're thinking of institutionalizing this as a regular engineer-confidence poll.... any thoughts on how to cast a wider company net without making the survey too burdensome for readers?



Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...