Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
timemerchant
User Rank
Rookie
re: EE says Apple design patents invalid
timemerchant   8/17/2012 2:09:34 AM
NO RATINGS
Apologies to the jury, but it is absolutely bizarre that they are not patent experts when the case revolves around infringement and the odds are $2,5 billion. It is not only the patent system that is broken, but the legal system looks about as ethical as the banking sector. It's all about money, but I hope the patent system starts to clear out the trolls, like the Moore portfolio microprocessor patent as a start.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: EE says Apple design patents invalid
Robotics Developer   8/17/2012 12:20:51 AM
NO RATINGS
I wonder how long it will take to reach a verdict? If memory serves (could be not remembering correctly), didn't they have something like the tablet on some of the early StarTrek shows? It seems to me that patenting the obvious should be off limits and stopped at the patent office prior to issuing the patent.

memxprt
User Rank
Rookie
re: EE says Apple design patents invalid
memxprt   8/16/2012 6:13:09 PM
NO RATINGS
It is funny how quickly we forget. Samsung grandfather in the Tabled back in 2005 with their Origami Tablet, it was ahead of its time. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1935854,00.asp

ReneCardenas
User Rank
Rookie
re: EE says Apple design patents invalid
ReneCardenas   8/16/2012 3:41:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Very interesting to see the likeness on the "prior art". If jury is applies common sense, and thier attention is focus on product look only, I find it hard to believe that Apple's claims would go far on the form-factor front. I think Apple's legal team should be forcing the focus on the GUI software and other techincal merits, IMHO

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Manager
re: EE says Apple design patents invalid
Sheetal.Pandey   8/16/2012 10:23:24 AM
NO RATINGS
in today's world filing a patent and owning a patent is much more important than actually doing the work. Its all business, hope the intellectuals doesnt suffer because of all this.

Daniel Payne
User Rank
CEO
re: EE says Apple design patents invalid
Daniel Payne   8/15/2012 8:27:04 PM
NO RATINGS
Finally some rational evidence that Apple should never have been issued so many patents on prior art, this is plain silly.

t.alex
User Rank
Rookie
re: EE says Apple design patents invalid
t.alex   8/15/2012 4:46:46 PM
NO RATINGS
Wow based on the evidence shown can we say the patents invalid ? Maybe it depends on the claims

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: EE says Apple design patents invalid
rick merritt   8/15/2012 1:30:31 PM
NO RATINGS
Anyone recall Fidler's tablet concepts from back in the day?

mgr
User Rank
Rookie
re: EE says Apple design patents invalid
mgr   8/15/2012 4:34:31 AM
NO RATINGS
A lot of design patents such as the one Apple is using to sue Samsung are either obvious or have been demonstrated in labs else where, as is shown here. The real innovation in packaging, the software and the others are stronger contenders and these should be explored. A common theme lawyers use in patent lawsuits is called interference: they pick apart elements of the claim by using "prior art," such as previously published patents, papers, other articles etc by pulling out similarly sounding names, something that is close and then claim that a combination of all these elements where ever they maybe... invalidates the specific element in the claim, the claim or the patent itself. However in this case, the Jury is not educated in nuances of patent law and is obvious to any any one the picture of the Knight Ridder tablet is the same as an iPAD. One has to look at a lot of patents issued such as for folding a napkin, mounting nuts on board etc etc... double clicking or using finger gestures to size and re-size things should not be patentable...at this rate my 3 year old son who use his finders to pretend he is sizing and re-sizing his imaginary space ship is infringing on the patents in some realm. A lot of patents filed are useless and big companies are guilty of it too. So it will be interesting to see how this turns out. Do not always believe it when big companies cry foul about patents and patent laws, they do not give anything for free either!. You infringe on any of their patent they come after you with a vengeance... you copy something of theirs they cry mommy and use all their resources to quash you.



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
Post a comment
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

Max Maxfield

Feast Your Orbs on My Jiggly Exercise Machine
Max Maxfield
54 comments
Last weekend, I was chatting with my mother on the phone. She's all excited that I'm coming over to visit for a week in November. "I'll be seeing you in only seven weeks," she trilled ...

David Blaza

RadioShack: The End Is Nigh!
David Blaza
124 comments
I'm feeling a little nostalgic today as I read about what looks like the imminent demise of RadioShack, at least as we currently know it. An old ubiquitous cartoon image popped into my ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
47 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...