Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Woody_99
User Rank
Author
re: The hits keep coming at Apple vs. Samsung
Woody_99   8/17/2012 9:19:01 AM
NO RATINGS
Back to one of the points in the article; patents and standards aren't always as clear cut as one would like. Lots of companies pay engineers for patents, but patents can take time to file and in the meantime the standards work progresses. So, do the standard body's rules require disclosure of applications or just awarded patents? Once the paperwork is filed for the application the engineer likely won't know the status until he gets his payment, which could take a couple of years, or maybe not at all. Youre call.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: The hits keep coming at Apple vs. Samsung
old account Frank Eory   8/16/2012 11:47:36 PM
NO RATINGS
Oh, I'd say the expert witnesses are all winners!

gatorfan
User Rank
Author
re: The hits keep coming at Apple vs. Samsung
gatorfan   8/16/2012 8:44:50 PM
NO RATINGS
Expert witnesses at $550/hr is as distasteful to me as everything else about this case. I don't see any winners in this the deeper it goes.

tpfj
User Rank
Author
re: The hits keep coming at Apple vs. Samsung
tpfj   8/16/2012 3:25:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Infineon only became Intel recently, you need to look back to 2007 and whether Infineon had cross-licensing or not. Noting that the baseband is worth $10 is irrelevant. IP holders will go after phone manufacturers if they can, not competitors, because they get royalties on higher ASPs (ie. their IP + screen + battery + ...). Fair? No, but that is the way the industry has always worked.

retiarius..1
User Rank
Author
re: The hits keep coming at Apple vs. Samsung
retiarius..1   8/16/2012 1:49:20 PM
NO RATINGS
Isn't suing the upstream customer (Apple for using an Infineon chip) incompatible with the Exhaustion Doctrine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exhaustion_doctrine similar to the First Sale Doctrine for copyright? And don't parts makers generally indemnify parts users in the electronics biz? It seems like the au courant thing to do, ala Samsung v. Apple here, or Google/Motorola for other IP snuck into standards, is to ignore the exhaustion doctrine and just go after the deepest pockets...

Sheetal.Pandey
User Rank
Author
re: The hits keep coming at Apple vs. Samsung
Sheetal.Pandey   8/16/2012 10:37:22 AM
NO RATINGS
I agree this is better than doing startups :-) Its one good fight to watch..

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: The hits keep coming at Apple vs. Samsung
rick merritt   8/15/2012 10:13:05 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually Intel does have a cross-license with Samsung, something Apple attorneys were quick to point out. Apple suggested Samsung can't charge Apple with being wrong when it was an Intel chip made under cross license. I believe there is still some virgin legal territory about suing your infringer's customer (Quanta case?) In addition, Apple noted its a $10 baseband chip and Samsung is seeing ~$430 million in damages for the infringement.

tpfj
User Rank
Author
re: The hits keep coming at Apple vs. Samsung
tpfj   8/15/2012 8:59:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually, Apple used Infineon in early versions of the iPhone. The reason this is being brought up is because unlike Qualcommm, to my knowledge Infineon does not have a cross-licensing agreement with Samsung, so Samsung cannot be accused of double-dipping here and is full within its rights to demand royalties for essential IP held by Samsung on these early iPhones sold by Apple (and there were a few of them). Yes, it it common place to be compensated for patents filed and obviously the goal is always for essential IPR. Why are you surprised by this? Non-disclosure of such IPR is not so common, but I'm sure it happens.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: The hits keep coming at Apple vs. Samsung
rick merritt   8/15/2012 8:00:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Soooooo, what do you know about those standard essential patents? Email or call me if you don't dare post the truth here!



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...