Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple vs. Samsung jury hears 84 instructions
DrQuine   8/25/2012 1:45:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Our legal education continues. In answer to my earlier question about how would the judge treat an error by the jury. The verdict is in and: "After reviewing the complex decision. Judge Koh found two errors. The jury awarded about $219,000 in damages for infringement involving the Galaxy Tab LTE even though it found that the device did not infringe Apple's patents. In addition, it found the Samsung Intercept handset did not infringe but cited it in inducement, a legal impossibility. Judge Koh pointed out the errors to the jury and dismissed to continue deliberations to resolve the $2.5 million question. Both sides are standing by while the legal detail are resolved." - http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4394710/Apple-wins--1-05B-in-Samsung-case?pageNumber=1

nicolas.mokhoff
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung jury hears 84 instructions
nicolas.mokhoff   8/22/2012 2:51:04 PM
NO RATINGS
I like the judge. She wants to go home early too: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57497096-37/apple-v-samsung-why-is-judge-koh-so-angry/

goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Apple vs. Samsung jury hears 84 instructions
goafrit   8/22/2012 6:59:00 AM
NO RATINGS
Let me add another one: All infringed. There is no really new in this world. Everyone copies. It is all semantics and lawyers pushing this out of scale.

DrQuine
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple vs. Samsung jury hears 84 instructions
DrQuine   8/22/2012 3:52:40 AM
NO RATINGS
What if the jury reaches a verdict that violates any of the complex instructions from the judge? Is there a mechanism for her to reject the verdict with reference to her instructions and send the jury back for further deliberations or is the only option for Apple or Samsung to appeal on the basis of that issue in another court?

rick merritt
User Rank
Blogger
re: Apple vs. Samsung jury hears 84 instructions
rick merritt   8/21/2012 11:57:03 PM
NO RATINGS
I was not in court during jury selection but Charlie Babcock, my peer from InformationWeek, was. Here's his story here: http://www.informationweek.com/mobility/smart-phones/apple-vs-samsung-opening-day-in-25-billi/240004611?queryText=babcock%20jury

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung jury hears 84 instructions
old account Frank Eory   8/21/2012 11:11:22 PM
NO RATINGS
You can bet that the lawyers from both sides wanted to exclude technical people from the jury!

markwrob
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung jury hears 84 instructions
markwrob   8/21/2012 10:42:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Are any of the jury members technically skilled? Or were all the scientists and engineers in the pool excused as soon as they stated their profession? If we think trials like these are head-scratchers, just imagine what it's like to be one of the actual jurors!

rick merritt
User Rank
Blogger
re: Apple vs. Samsung jury hears 84 instructions
rick merritt   8/21/2012 9:02:30 PM
NO RATINGS
A Samsung lawyer told me more than 1,900 pages have now been filed in this case.

engineer505
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple vs. Samsung jury hears 84 instructions
engineer505   8/21/2012 8:57:33 PM
NO RATINGS
The possible outcomes are: 1) Samsung infringed 2) Apple infringed 3) Both infringed 4) Neither infringed Any outcome other than the first will compell Apple to take it to Appeals court. Best hope for ending this drama is to find Samsung guilty of infringement (not willfull however) but not to the degree claimed by Apple ...so the damages will be in the $100s of millions which will be further reduced by royalties that Apple will have to pay for Samsung's 3G patents. Neither party is entirely innocent and the market is big enough for both (and a few more) ...it's not in the interest of the consumer or even the future of innovation to let one of these two to dominate the global market! reddy

betajet
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple vs. Samsung jury hears 84 instructions
betajet   8/21/2012 7:52:40 PM
NO RATINGS
So if the jury would like to get home early, it behooves them to decide that nobody infringed. That way they don't have to deliberate over damages, which could take days. Oracle v. Google was similar, although in that case the trial over damages could not begin unless the jury decided there was infringement. They decided there wasn't any and went home early.



Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Engineer's Bookshelf
Caleb Kraft

The Martian: A Delightful Exploration of Math, Mars & Feces
Caleb Kraft
5 comments
To say that Andy Weir's The Martian is an exploration of math, Mars, and feces is a slight simplification. I doubt that the author would have any complaints, though.

The Engineering Life - Around the Web
Caleb Kraft

Surprise TOQ Teardown at EELive!
Caleb Kraft
Post a comment
This year, for EELive! I had a little surprise that I was quite eager to share. Qualcomm had given us a TOQ smart watch in order to award someone a prize. We were given complete freedom to ...

Design Contests & Competitions
Caleb Kraft

Join The Balancing Act With April's Caption Contest
Caleb Kraft
56 comments
Sometimes it can feel like you're really performing in the big tent when presenting your hardware. This month's caption contest exemplifies this wonderfully.

Engineering Investigations
Caleb Kraft

Frankenstein's Fix: The Winners Announced!
Caleb Kraft
8 comments
The Frankenstein's Fix contest for the Tektronix Scope has finally officially come to an end. We had an incredibly amusing live chat earlier today to announce the winners. However, we ...

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)