Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 4
rusreb
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
rusreb   8/25/2012 3:25:58 AM
NO RATINGS
That or withhold or increase the costs to them of key display technology. Don't know how their flexible displays will work out or if they hold key patents to those but if they do it's conceivable Apple could soon be the only phone without a lower power/ thinner/ flexible display. That could really hurt. :(

Comfortable
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
Comfortable   8/25/2012 2:34:33 AM
NO RATINGS
5% doesn't work. Sales for 2012 to Apple = $11B. Need to raise 10%.

tpfj
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
tpfj   8/25/2012 2:30:11 AM
NO RATINGS
So the jury finds Samsung's essential IP valid, but Apple not infringing? So they think the standards committee has it wrong when they say it is essential to the making of a phone?

Comfortable
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
Comfortable   8/25/2012 2:27:45 AM
NO RATINGS
$1B ? Hmmm... Isn't that offset by raising the price they charge Apple for their Samsung-manufactured ICs by about 5% ?

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
Robotics Developer   8/25/2012 1:52:14 AM
NO RATINGS
I am surprised by the amount! I wonder what the long term effect of this will be on cellphone and smartphone designs? 33 multi-part questions, that must have been a nightmare for the jury, I hope that they got paid well..

_hm
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
_hm   8/25/2012 12:08:17 AM
NO RATINGS
Samsung designer will have much difficult time ahead as they may not again like to infringe iPhone5 patents.

askubel
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
askubel   8/24/2012 11:52:41 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't believe the SIII was on trial in this case (it wasn't available when the charges were filed). This may change with future lawsuits, of course. For now the worst thing for Samsung is that consumers might get the idea that their phones are nothing but ripoffs. Nevermind the fact that the only patents they were found guilty of infringing are trivial UI elements; that's not easily understood by the average consumer. Simply the idea that something is a "copy" automatically conveys the idea of inferiority. Anyways, I hope the next headline isn't "Enraged Samsung employee starts fire at 32nm fab".

selinz
User Rank
Manager
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
selinz   8/24/2012 11:41:28 PM
NO RATINGS
With a net income of about 5billion/qtr for the whole company, I'm sure that this stings a bit. But the bigger question is can they continue to sell the S3 and tablet?

<<   <   Page 4 / 4


Most Recent Comments
Ariella
 
Max The Magnificent
 
Sanjib.A
 
mbranda
 
Ariella
 
nick_rb
 
alexvoica
 
alex_m1
 
prabhakar_deosthali
Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Is Your System Cyber-Secure?
Max Maxfield
23 comments
Until recently, I was under the impression that my computer system in general -- and my precious data in particular -- was reasonably secure against the forces of evil, but then my eyes ...

Rich Quinnell

Bloopers Book Helps Improve GUI Development
Rich Quinnell
2 comments
Courtesy of fellow editor "Max" Maxfield (aka Max the Magnificent), I recently acquired a copy of GUI Bloopers 2.0 by Jeff Johnson of UI Wizards. I found it an interesting read chock full ...

Martin Rowe

Make This Engineering Museum a Reality
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
Vincent Valentine is a man on a mission. He wants to make the first house to ever have a telephone into a telephone museum. Without help, it may not happen.

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
16 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...