Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
selinz
User Rank
Author
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
selinz   8/24/2012 11:41:28 PM
NO RATINGS
With a net income of about 5billion/qtr for the whole company, I'm sure that this stings a bit. But the bigger question is can they continue to sell the S3 and tablet?

askubel
User Rank
Author
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
askubel   8/24/2012 11:52:41 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't believe the SIII was on trial in this case (it wasn't available when the charges were filed). This may change with future lawsuits, of course. For now the worst thing for Samsung is that consumers might get the idea that their phones are nothing but ripoffs. Nevermind the fact that the only patents they were found guilty of infringing are trivial UI elements; that's not easily understood by the average consumer. Simply the idea that something is a "copy" automatically conveys the idea of inferiority. Anyways, I hope the next headline isn't "Enraged Samsung employee starts fire at 32nm fab".

_hm
User Rank
Author
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
_hm   8/25/2012 12:08:17 AM
NO RATINGS
Samsung designer will have much difficult time ahead as they may not again like to infringe iPhone5 patents.

Robotics Developer
User Rank
Author
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
Robotics Developer   8/25/2012 1:52:14 AM
NO RATINGS
I am surprised by the amount! I wonder what the long term effect of this will be on cellphone and smartphone designs? 33 multi-part questions, that must have been a nightmare for the jury, I hope that they got paid well..

Comfortable
User Rank
Author
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
Comfortable   8/25/2012 2:27:45 AM
NO RATINGS
$1B ? Hmmm... Isn't that offset by raising the price they charge Apple for their Samsung-manufactured ICs by about 5% ?

tpfj
User Rank
Author
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
tpfj   8/25/2012 2:30:11 AM
NO RATINGS
So the jury finds Samsung's essential IP valid, but Apple not infringing? So they think the standards committee has it wrong when they say it is essential to the making of a phone?

Comfortable
User Rank
Author
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
Comfortable   8/25/2012 2:34:33 AM
NO RATINGS
5% doesn't work. Sales for 2012 to Apple = $11B. Need to raise 10%.

rusreb
User Rank
Author
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
rusreb   8/25/2012 3:25:58 AM
NO RATINGS
That or withhold or increase the costs to them of key display technology. Don't know how their flexible displays will work out or if they hold key patents to those but if they do it's conceivable Apple could soon be the only phone without a lower power/ thinner/ flexible display. That could really hurt. :(

gatorfan
User Rank
Author
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
gatorfan   8/25/2012 3:45:13 AM
NO RATINGS
Apple didn't reach this point to cut their throat. They are the leading Supply Chain management firm in the electronics universe. You can bet they have alternatives for their components.

NewYankEE
User Rank
Author
re: Apple awarded $1.05B in Samsung patent case
NewYankEE   8/25/2012 3:54:59 AM
NO RATINGS
"I hope that they got paid well.." Never heard of jury duty equating to being paid well (it usually a pittance)....perhaps you're confusing the jury with the expert witnesses or the lawyers.

Page 1 / 4   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...