Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 13 / 14   >   >>
Stanley_
User Rank
Author
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
Stanley_   8/28/2012 6:46:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Now I wonder who owns look and feel patent of notebook.. rectangle and flat with rounded corner having clam shell to open up and down, and one side has screen and to other side has key board.. I'm very glad apple doesn't file law suit on this.

hari.tadepalli
User Rank
Author
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
hari.tadepalli   8/28/2012 6:44:55 PM
NO RATINGS
It is amazing that the USPTO has awarded these patents for these "inventions" that could be invented by any able minded high schooler. Browser GUIs implemented scroll based zooming a while ago. Now translate that to a touch based interaction - it naturally becomes a pinch and expand. Double clicking was used to zoom images for over a decade and half. What will it traslate to in a touch based intetraction? Recently, the London Olympics regulator have forbidding all reastaurants in the Olympic neighborhood from selling "French Fries" claiming they violate the trademark of McDonalds. The message is loud and clear - if you have the power to bankroll a world class law firm to battle it out, you can patent anything and exact a payment from your users or competitors. I bet Apple has patents for winking any eye, flipping a page with the index finger and holding a book at a certain angle while reading.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
rick merritt   8/28/2012 6:42:43 PM
NO RATINGS
I think bounce back and double tap are pretty cool and patentable ideas. But I also think Samsung showed some pretty compelling prior art and expert testimony against both that I might not have been able to dismiss had I been on the jury. See http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4394167/Bonbons-and-bombshells-from-the-courtroom

Daniel Payne
User Rank
Author
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
Daniel Payne   8/28/2012 6:41:31 PM
NO RATINGS
I cannot wait for the appeal process to begin.

gurista974
User Rank
Author
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
gurista974   8/28/2012 6:37:03 PM
NO RATINGS
People who went through the process of getting a patent are completely biased. If patents weren't weapons to use against potential "enemies" then going through the process was stupid. People don't want THEIR decisions to be stupid so they will defend others who made the same decisions.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Author
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
mcgrathdylan   8/28/2012 6:08:02 PM
NO RATINGS
It's pretty interesting to me that this engineer and inventor made it to the jury. I've heard previously that engineers are nearly always excused from juries because the lawyers don't want their analytical minds involved. Here's a guy who has his own experience both inventing things and patenting them.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
old account Frank Eory   8/28/2012 5:59:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Many innovations seem obvious after you see them. If pinch and un-pinch for zooming in & out are so obvious, and the bounce-back when scrolling to the edge of a page is so obvious, then where is the prior art? You said other devices implemented these interactions over the years, but nobody bothered to patent them. Which other devices? I'm curious, because I believe if you took a poll of millions of consumer electronics users and asked them about these features or interactions, the majority would say they first saw that on an Apple product.

jer006
User Rank
Author
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
jer006   8/28/2012 5:33:28 PM
NO RATINGS
This is a crazy verdict, some of the patents in question are to do with finger scrolling, tap to zoom, pinch to zoom etc ('381 included)... Companies other than samsung have implemented these interactions and more in other devices over the years but unlike apple they have never seen fit to patent them as they just made sense! If you can patent these "obvious" interactions then you might as well patent the light switch on the wall and make all other manufacturers pay out for that too! This decision was a stupid verdict which as usual in all patent disputes will likely end up simply costing the end consumer more. Yes samsung copied apple in terms of the UI and the device shape but who does'nt copy or directly compare against competitor products anymore to get an edge on the competition! Designs are copied and improved upon each and every day in the world - car manufacturers for example are building more and more hybrid vehicles, they all copy the same basic principle but are implemented by independent companies, why is that not considered a patent breach? It is madness that companies like apple can patent these seemingly obvious and uncomplicated interactions and then through moronic actions like this court case and the stupid decisions of the jurors they can win! Absolute stupidity, apple should be slapped on the hand for patenting these in the first place and the patents should be cancelled. Samsung should be slapped for being dumb enough to directly copy apple mind you I doubt it did not hurt/impact apple in any way so 1 billion reward is insane! Another case of grand patent wars (and apple) stifling innovation. Also the 8 devices that apple are seeking to ban are no longer sold in the USA, they are old devices so this is clearly apples "I told you so now pay up" moment!

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
rick merritt   8/28/2012 4:50:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Actually, the tablet you refer to was one of the prior art items Samsung introduced in the case. The jury decided none of the Samsung tablets infringed because the design was significantly different from the iPad design patent.

Nomen
User Rank
Author
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
Nomen   8/28/2012 4:00:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Ridiculous, Knight Ridder invented the design, or rather it was patently obvious: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBEtPQDQNcI

<<   <   Page 13 / 14   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35