Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 9 / 14   >   >>
spoli
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
spoli   8/28/2012 8:55:55 PM
NO RATINGS
One cannot argue that the jury was biased despite of the foreman not being an i-device fan. In the end Apple is an iconic American company and the jury felt compelled to defend it. This bias is especially visible in the following statement of the foreman: "My light bulb moment came that Wednesday night when I asked myself if I could defend it..." This happened BEFORE analyzing the evidence in the case. The jury started from the premise that Samsung infringed Apple IPs and went from here to justify this decision. I know this is expedient and probably perceived as "patriotic" but lacks in fairness. Prior art is always a slippery slope in the IP legislation and Samsung made the mistake of relying too much on this argument in both circumstances: when they used such knowledge in their designs (despite of warnings) and when they used it their defense. Unfortunately, without changing IP legislation, this verdict will only stifle innovation and competition making room for monopoly and more corporate bullying.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
old account Frank Eory   8/28/2012 8:53:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Side by side view of the two companies' app icons. Now tell me that two different graphic artists came up with these completely independently, without one being influenced by the other! http://www.esphoneblog.com/2011/04/20/apple-vs-samsung-menu-icons-side-by-side/

R. S. Moore
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
R. S. Moore   8/28/2012 8:51:14 PM
NO RATINGS
Perhaps if the first car manufacturer only patented rounded wheels. Then as long as any other manufacturers chose a different shape...

anon9303122
User Rank
Freelancer
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
anon9303122   8/28/2012 8:43:46 PM
NO RATINGS
Now that I think about it, I'm glad the foreman is talking. All the more material for an appeal. The real problem is our patent system is broke. Fmotta (above) has some common sense ideas to rein in the abuses of our patent system.

RTewell
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
RTewell   8/28/2012 8:42:16 PM
NO RATINGS
"The verdict “was a message to the industry at large that if you are going to compete in this country there’s a set of rules, and if you decide to take a calculated risk and infringe you need to be willing to pay a price for it,” he said." Wow...that line right there could be grounds for appeal. Geez oh Peet. So if a US company copies Apple it is OK...but if a Korean company does it...it isn't? Even if that wasn't the intent of the statement...it certainly smacks of a bias towards the United States...which could be all that is needed to throw doubt on the legitimacy of the verdict. If you read that carefully...the jury was SENDING A MESSAGE? Was that their job?

xprmntl
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
xprmntl   8/28/2012 8:39:35 PM
NO RATINGS
McDonalds doesn't have a trademark on "french fries," they had an exclusive licensing deal with the London Organizing Comitte (LOCOG). Same with Coca-Cola, Cadbury and Heineken--they were the only branded food and drink on sale.

spoli
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
spoli   8/28/2012 8:38:55 PM
NO RATINGS
Indeed Jeff Han is the father of multi-touch devices. He deserves the credit for most of the gestures we use today. Ironically, he is the son of middle-class Korean immigrants... If he would have worked for Samsung at the time he invented his touch screen, I wonder how the smartphones and tablets would have evolved? And what Apple would have done?

apummer945
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
apummer945   8/28/2012 8:36:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, I witnessed the ENERKON patent trial a few years ego, it changed my opinion on the American Jurisdiction

RTewell
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
RTewell   8/28/2012 8:36:23 PM
NO RATINGS
The jury was incapable of "making the right decision". They didn't spend anywhere near enough time deliberating nor do I think they could have understood all the technical details required to render a just verdict. It was simply beyond their capacity to do so. Let's just hand Apple a billion dollars and call it a day... C'mon. I'm not saying that Samsung didn't infringe...I really don't know. I just don't think this jury could have made that determination (which also wasn't their fault - they were put in the position to make some decision). I just hope the appeals courts will treat this differently and spend the appropriate time convening and listening to REAL experts to make the final decision.

Hughston
User Rank
CEO
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
Hughston   8/28/2012 8:33:05 PM
NO RATINGS
An engineer would look at the design and say much of that was done before Apple did it.

<<   <   Page 9 / 14   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).