Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 14   >   >>
RichQ
User Rank
CEO
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
RichQ   8/29/2012 6:33:27 PM
NO RATINGS
While patent reform is clearly necessary, I think some of your suggestions would be counter productive. Forcing the applicant to bear the full cost of a review, for instance, would most likely prohibit individuals from participating in the process. It would create an uneven playing field where deep pockets have the advantage in obtaining protection for inventions. They could, in fact, steal inventions from those who don't try to patent them due to lack of funds, then fund their own patent and get the benefit. The exclusive use limit you propose also seems excessively short. It may well take that long for the patent holder to get their invention through production to market, especially if they are working with limited funding. The idea of litigation involving domain experts, however, seems like it has merit. Evaluating what constitutes "prior art" and "obviousness" requires deeper understanding of technology than most folks have. I think the real flaw lies in the granting of so many patents in the first place and the breadth of claims that those patents make.If I were to reform the patent system, I would start by upgrading the resources available to the patent examiner's office to perform as exhaustive an evaluation as possible.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
CEO
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
wilber_xbox   8/29/2012 6:12:01 PM
NO RATINGS
But maybe this is unusual to boast about how one juror influenced others and seemly decided the fate of the case.

wilber_xbox
User Rank
CEO
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
wilber_xbox   8/29/2012 6:08:52 PM
NO RATINGS
maybe someone can patent that too LOL!

tvojnovich277
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
tvojnovich277   8/29/2012 4:34:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Well....having 30 patents myself and seeing the hubris in claims (actually saw a prior patent claming "knowledge is good"....so in essence, EVERY patent since then is really infringing on that patent...cant wait until the "patent trolling types" get a hold of it and sues everybody on the planet). A more interesting scenario is whether tupperware sues Apple RE "rounded corners" piece of this. After all, tupperware has had rounded corners for 50 years and the idea of "pinching" goes back 100s of years ("just this much more of something"). Sounds like alot of people will get rich on this one!!!!

nicolas.mokhoff
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
nicolas.mokhoff   8/29/2012 4:33:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Agree. The transistor needed protection, that's for sure: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor

Stanley_
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
Stanley_   8/29/2012 2:53:38 PM
NO RATINGS
no, it's rounded with small R.

R0ckstar
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
R0ckstar   8/29/2012 2:37:13 PM
NO RATINGS
I don't think so. The difference between expert testimony and a discussion is when and where it takes place. "Testimony" behind closed doors is nothing more than a discussion. A discussion under oath in front of a judge and jurors is testimony.

R0ckstar
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
R0ckstar   8/29/2012 2:19:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Pinch to zoom and other similar capabilities were demonstrated publicly at the TED conference in Mexico City in 2006 and possibly earlier than that.

p519
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
p519   8/29/2012 1:19:30 PM
NO RATINGS
RS, Great observation. I've heard the same, in the context of murder trials, when jurors did their own experiments on whether a victim would/could fall in a certain way (I forget which murder case), it was enough to cause a re-trial.

Tombo0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
Tombo0   8/29/2012 1:14:10 PM
NO RATINGS
There seems to be people who believe strongly on both sides of this issue. I'd be interested to know how many commenters have patents and whether they agree or disagree with the decision. I suspect that most that disagree won't have patents but it would be interesting to find out.

<<   <   Page 3 / 14   >   >>


Flash Poll
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer

Future Engineers: Don’t 'Trip Up' on Your College Road Trip
Rishabh N. Mahajani, High School Senior and Future Engineer
2 comments
A future engineer shares his impressions of a recent tour of top schools and offers advice on making the most of the time-honored tradition of the college road trip.

Max Maxfield

Juggling a Cornucopia of Projects
Max Maxfield
7 comments
I feel like I'm juggling a lot of hobby projects at the moment. The problem is that I can't juggle. Actually, that's not strictly true -- I can juggle ten fine china dinner plates, but ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
37 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Karen Field

July Cartoon Caption Contest: Let's Talk Some Trash
Karen Field
139 comments
Steve Jobs allegedly got his start by dumpster diving with the Computer Club at Homestead High in the early 1970s.

Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)