Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 14   >   >>
Tom Murphy
User Rank
Blogger
Google Droid Boss Moves to China's Xiaomi
Tom Murphy   8/29/2013 12:39:01 PM
NO RATINGS
Now that Google's Hugo Barra (VP for Droid) is going to China's Xiaomi, I wonder what you all think that means to China's ambitions in the global handset market?  Should Samsung be worried?  Apple?  Does this guarantee the global importance of Droid in the mobile market for the foreseeable future?

forex brokers
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
forex brokers   12/12/2012 3:58:49 AM
NO RATINGS
With the advent and widespread accessibility of the internet, online forex brokers have become very popular;

rwik78
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
rwik78   10/5/2012 1:44:47 AM
NO RATINGS
http://www.examiner.com/article/samsung-says-jury-foreman-apple-lawsuit-lied-files-motion-for-new-trial I think Mr. Hogan had his lightbulb moment in 1993.

rwik78
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
rwik78   9/4/2012 1:46:01 AM
NO RATINGS
My sentiments exactly....

Bill Gatliff
User Rank
Blogger
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
Bill Gatliff   9/3/2012 10:53:58 PM
NO RATINGS
Good news is, there now seems to be ample evidence for a mistrial. Whether you agree with the verdict or not, this juror completely subverted the justice process. The fact that he's so bursting with pride that he can't even see what he has done just doubles the epic fail.

jackOfManyTrades
User Rank
Manager
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
jackOfManyTrades   9/3/2012 9:09:03 AM
NO RATINGS
It seems to me that there were two trials here: one conucted in open court and then another one conducted in private in the jury room.

Navaneethan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
Navaneethan   8/31/2012 9:28:31 PM
NO RATINGS
The result of the lawsuit shows how out-of-touch the current patent system is. A system that is not too different from the one that enabled/encouraged the British East India Company to conquer America, India and other countries... I like Apple's products a lot (bought iPhone 1, iPhone 3GS, iPad 1, new iPad and a MacBook) and admire Steve Jobs/Apple's focus. But this lawsuit is a sham. Even if Samsung copied some of iPhone's features, the final result of awarding 15% of Samsung profits is just plain wrong. Here's a simple reason why - I bought a Samsung Galaxy S2 not because of the Zoom, Rotate or List scrolling features or its likeness to iPhone. I bought it for the simple reason that it was more flexible (for customizaiton), more open & I could easily move files around. Why does Samsung have to return the profit from my sale? The jury decided on a very simple reasoning that Samsung infringed these 5 patents and these 5 patents were the only reason all of Samsung's customers bought their phones. That's too simplistic. Based on so much prior art listed in the comments section of this article alone (including the awesome TED video), the patents should be declared invalid. Apple has already more than enjoyed the fruits of their labor with the iPhones and iPads with unprecedented profits & stock price. This lawsuit shows both greediness and worry that they can't keep up with the innovation in the rest of the smartphone world. To Apple's engineers - I'm sorry that after all your hard work, your lawyers had to prove your innovation based on a scrolling, zooming and pretty icons... Keep up the good work.

Darryl.Buchanan
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
Darryl.Buchanan   8/31/2012 7:12:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Jurors are free citizens and a public trial is just that - public. They can say anything they want. However, I do NOT recommend you do so. In two juries I was the foreman on the last thing I told the others was that they had the right to say anything they wanted to anyone about it. But I for one absolutely refused to be interviewed by attorneys for either side and I recommended that other jurors also refuse. My mother-in-law allowed herself to be interviewed by attorneys after a case and was promptly sued by those attorneys. Defending herself ran into 10's of thousands of dollars.

wskehr
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
wskehr   8/31/2012 6:22:05 PM
NO RATINGS
It seems the process has degenerated some since Albert Einstein worked at the patent office.

rwik78
User Rank
Rookie
re: Jury foreman in Apple vs. Samsung had 'light bulb moment'
rwik78   8/31/2012 12:07:28 AM
NO RATINGS
I totally agree with you on one point. The iphone changed the mobile world, forever. And once again with the ipad. No one can refute that. And I agree, the most compelling factor for this was the interface, including the two UI patents. And part of the story was the looks, but in my mind, an insignificant part. There have been better looking phones before and after iphone. Consider Nokia 9 series, LG prada, Samsung SGH, LG prada among many others. None have been as successful, and for a good reason: As far as looks are concerned, I would always go for an iphone over say, a galaxy S or S2. [The SIII is a different story]. The reason so many people bought the S/S2 was mostly because of cost, Android openness vs Apple closed system , hardware specs, and yeah! Samsung's brand image. The UI patents were valid targets. I do feel however since they are quite obvious (yes, in hindsight) they probably should be licensed to promote fair competition,rather than fought over in courtrooms. Apple is an innovative company. But they need to continue to innovate to keep ahead of competition, not use lawsuit to kill competition. We seem to have forgotten that the cellphone is not a piece of plastic/metal/glass or a piece of software existing in the ethernet. Samsung OLEDs or tehcnology manufacturing involves 100s of innovations. The average user takes them for granted, but these are part of what makes the iphone or ipad tick. So, in one sense, Samsung shares the success of Apple, and contributes to the innovative process. One must not ignore that when calling them copycats. P.S: The windows 8/RT release timing seems to be superb, in light of this lawsuit. Curious as to if and how that changes the landscape.

Page 1 / 14   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Energizing the Young Engineers of Tomorrow
Max Maxfield
15 comments
It doesn't seem all that long ago when I was a bright-eyed, bushy-tailed young engineer. Now I feel like an old fool, but where are we going to find one at this time of the day (LOL)?

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...