Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Duane Benson
User Rank
re: What were they thinking: backups and patents
Duane Benson   9/17/2012 1:17:51 AM
The nice thing about the cost of disk storage these days, as well as the speed of USB 3.0, is that, in my opinion, now is the first time in a long time that personal back up is viable. There have always been back up systems, but most have been unwieldy to the point that they just were not practical unless a discipline IT department was in charge. I've been using computers since the early 1980's, and though I did my best to keep important files backed up, today's 1TB USB 3.0 external drive is the first system that I've felt like I could use without hassle, and take with me when traveling.

David Brown
User Rank
re: What were they thinking: backups and patents
David Brown   9/16/2012 8:17:58 AM
I don't think there are /any/ existing patent systems with are functional for modern technology. There are three main reasons why patents are a bigger problem in the US than other countries. The first is that the US allows patents on more things - such as patenting a black rectangle as a shape for a phone, and software patents. The second is that in the US there is a poor implementation of their patent system. Did you know that in the US, patent offices get budgets based on the number of patents they award - not for the work they are supposed to do? The assumption in the US is that the applicant is telling the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about the eligibility of the patent and prior art. The idea is that if they should not have the patent (either due to a mistake, or by deception), then someone will challenge it in court and it will be overthrown. Which brings us to the final point... In the US legal system, in almost all business vs. business civil cases, the company willing to spend the most money will win. This combines to make patents in the USA into a club that companies can legally buy to beat protection money out of other companies. You ask what would be a better patent system? For most areas, /no/ patents would be much better. Copyrights and trade marks are good enough protection. Dropping patents would greatly reduce the costs of companies developing new products. There are a few areas where something more is needed, such as in medical research - but patents are not the answer there either.

User Rank
re: What were they thinking: backups and patents
Spice1   9/15/2012 4:00:55 PM
Just curious which patent system is the most functional? It seems that the patent trolls are abusing all of the systems and due to differing legal systems making it difficult to standardize the patent system. But it appears that the US is working to bring our patent system into alignment with other systems on March 16, 2013. Whether or not this will actually improve the system we must wait and see.

David Brown
User Rank
re: What were they thinking: backups and patents
David Brown   9/5/2012 8:45:54 AM
You might like to note in your article that it was the first /American/ patent office that opened in 1790, it was the /American/ patent office that burned down, and so on. And it is the /American/ patent system that was "on trial", and that is so badly broken. Looking beyond your own navel, you can see Apple losing to Samsung in almost identical cases in different courts around the world. Most countries' patent systems are broken - partly due to giving in to American pressure to follow their system and accept their patents - but few are quite as badly broken as the American system. Most countries' civil courts systems also have big problems, but few are as badly broken as in the USA (where you have a law system, but not a "justice" system). Here's hoping that at least some people in the USA will realise that they are a small part of a big world, and it pays to lift your head and look around. There they will see how the rest of the world alternates between laughing at the American patent and court system, or crying about it, or simply feeling sorry for the poor sods who have to live with that mess. Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...