REGISTER | LOGIN
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
csmaurojr
User Rank
Author
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
csmaurojr   9/4/2012 10:17:46 PM
NO RATINGS
You must be joking... THIS is where we're headed? Somehow, I doubt that Intel and others are too worried about the potential competition. Still, it does cause one pause, and in thinking about it, I can see all sorts of low-end applications that beg for as close to zero power if were possible to achieve. This may help.

Wilton.Helm
User Rank
Author
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
Wilton.Helm   9/4/2012 9:49:45 PM
NO RATINGS
One possible advantage would be that this takes us back to the polarity insensitive and bidirictional current flow inherent in a relay. Back when logic was routinely made from relays, those attributes were routinely taken advantage of to create systems that weren't strictly boolean in nature. The result was fewer relays (and lower power consumption).

Jayna Sheats
User Rank
Author
re: IBM, ST go back to the future with nanorelay logic
Jayna Sheats   9/4/2012 4:39:39 PM
NO RATINGS
Work on this topic has been going on at UC Berkeley for several years and they are making small scale demonstrators now. How does the European academic background work compare?

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Most Recent Comments
David Ashton
 
Smartalix
 
Sang-Yun
 
Sang-Yun
 
realjjj
 
DMcCunney
 
David Ashton
 
rick merritt
 
rick merritt
Like Us on Facebook