Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
workfunction
User Rank
Author
re: Intel describes 22-nm SoC process, not chips
workfunction   12/21/2012 5:36:58 PM
NO RATINGS
I can't think of any way that Intel's 22nm process integration is cost competitive against the foundry cost. Unless the finFET yields at the foundries are really bad ( a possibility since it would be their first generation)

rfab
User Rank
Author
re: Intel describes 22-nm SoC process, not chips
rfab   9/18/2012 8:51:37 AM
NO RATINGS
The larger SRAM SIZE, yields do better i think you a TSMC employees

rfab
User Rank
Author
re: Intel describes 22-nm SoC process, not chips
rfab   9/18/2012 8:46:22 AM
NO RATINGS
(foundry 28nm and Intel's SOC 22nm has about same transistor density making it a reasonable point of comparison)----- REALY INTEL 22 SRAM=0.09 TSMC 28=0.127,INTEL SOC SRAM=2.6G /0.75V TSMC 28?

James7740
User Rank
Author
re: Intel describes 22-nm SoC process, not chips
James7740   9/15/2012 6:19:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Means if foundry product requires a full range of transistors (low leakage,RF, quality analog  etc.) for a mobile 22nm SOC, that is not offered even for internal intel product until end of 2013.  Mobile SOC intel foundry  customers thus at a disadvantage  compared to tsmc and other foundry. 

SiliconAsia
User Rank
Author
re: Intel describes 22-nm SoC process, not chips
SiliconAsia   9/14/2012 3:54:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Is this mean a few companies using Intel notably as foundry for 22nm do not have any advantages using Intel 22nm over TSMC/Samsung bulk 28nm?

song-chou-1
User Rank
Author
re: Intel describes 22-nm SoC process, not chips
song-chou-1   9/14/2012 1:49:03 PM
NO RATINGS
Finally, Intel's Mr. Silicon admits Intel does not lead in silicon technology for SOC "It’s fair to say Intel didn’t have much of a focus four or five years ago on SoCs, but that’s changed,” said Mark Bohr", plus more at http://www.semiwiki.com/forum/content/1636-intel-finally-comes-clean-22nm-socs.html Intel's mobile/Atom 22nm SOC in market in late 2013 is 2 years behind Foundry/ARM 28 nm shipping now (foundry 28nm and Intel's SOC 22nm has about same transistor density making it a reasonable point of comparison). Intel's silicon group has been the biggest hindrance to getting into mobile market. Intel's move to finFET has also been a major setback to getting into mobile market. Intel finFET SOC have been talked about for 2 years but are still another 1.5 years away from chips on market. Intel's finFET SOC is late since large delay in moving all the design IP due to issues with transistor matching, analog, RF , and I/O are all not attractive on a bulk finFET SOC vs since at total chip system level intel's 22nm finFET has negligible advantage over foundry 28nm planar transistor.



Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...