It is true, children need these skills from an early age because this is the demand in our world today and the demand will stay like this for a long time from now on. Schools should be prepared for that. There are some interesting training programs on http://www.goodbuddynotes.com/productsforteachers.html. Interested parents should check this out. The future is in the hands of our children.
I've been mentoring students on inner-city USFirst robotics teams for the past four years. These students have never had to apply trigonometry to solve a real problem. We introduce physics, research, electronics, mechanics, pneumatics, programming, and shop. Along with presenting your ideas, brainstorming, and experimentation. Our students are shown its okay to fail as we modify and fix our designs while building a robot. Hopefully they also learn to listen.
We have not been too successful teaching AutoDesk 3D Inventor, PTC MathCad, nor programming WPI Java with Netbeans. But we haven't given up yet, and we have some students that still might decide to dive in. I would have killed to have this opportunity in High School.
There is much more to teach than programming PICs, or reading a circuit, or lighting up an LED. Showing our students that we can design, build, debug, program, and run a robot in a little more than six weeks is intense. Showing them that they can do more is priceless.
I say yes, robotics is a great way to show students how to apply math and science.
My experience as mentor in electronics and robotics is with 5th to 9th graders. There is a significant improvement in critical thinking and analysis after taking this technical engineering class, this skills are not only limited to the class, they learn to apply it to other situations and use it to their advantage...there is the "student learning skills development" Not sure if pic is good for mid school, but arduino has been a big success, as well processing..it is a start point for creativity...one way or the other...we have to do something....
It has been my experience as a High School level coach of a robotics competition team (FIRST www.usfirst.org) that the students are very capable. What is normally missing is the motivation and technical guidance. The students (once motivated by the competition) are able to learn to solve complex problems involving mechanical, electrical, programming and systems level challenges. The thing that makes the most difference is mentors! The mentoring of students provides them with help through some of the more difficult to navigate problem areas and allows them to achieve some success. Once the students have tasted success it becomes a more powerful incentive to continue to strive and grow. The FRC program (FIRST Robotics Competition) brings together all the right ingredients for a successful recipe. One advantage of the program is the real world tools and language use that is a real life skill for the students.
A good article. The kids to be first introduced with R,L,C ,D.C and A.C, frequency, semiconductors and then IC chips and programming.Then it is possible for them to read schematics and have a basic under standing why and how these components are inter connected. This will take a big time some where near 150 hours to 300 hours. Probably they can do it in their summer vacation.Also this can be introduced in schools to all the students.The teachers need lot of patience and more focused on individual kid to bring their talents up. By knowing this i appreciate very much Mr.David Peins.
What is easy to understand about a PIC controller or the ardunio computers that are everywhere. Being able to follow a recipe does not make one a good cook. Letting kids work with robots is one way to introduce them to a lot of the very basic physics, as they make things happen. As an engineer I have taught quite a few people a lot of different things, they seemed to learn very well. Of course, I started with the "What", and then we got to the how and why afterwards. That does seem to work fairly well.
The problem with teaching programming is that most of what they learn in third will be obsolete by the time they reach fifth grade. And I am not convinced that logical thinking and programming are related in any way. Programming is much more about steps in sequence than about actual logic. So learning about how to develop sequences is a fundamental part of programming.
Replay available now: A handful of emerging network technologies are competing to be the preferred wide-area connection for the Internet of Things. All claim lower costs and power use than cellular but none have wide deployment yet. Listen in as proponents of leading contenders make their case to be the metro or national IoT network of the future. Rick Merritt, EE Times Silicon Valley Bureau Chief, moderators this discussion. Join in and ask his guests questions.