Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 4 / 6   >   >>
abraxalito
User Rank
Author
re: Intel plans to crush ARM beyond 20 nm
abraxalito   9/26/2012 12:59:00 AM
NO RATINGS
"...we have an 'aha' moment every day, every minute in every single Intel product,” he said." Yeah, riiiight. My 'aha' moment for this particular minute is that this is yet another Intel puff piece.

abraxalito
User Rank
Author
re: Intel plans to crush ARM beyond 20 nm
abraxalito   9/26/2012 12:48:44 AM
NO RATINGS
I suspect Intel isn't selling its propaganda - rather its paying people to swallow it ;-)

KB3001
User Rank
Author
re: Intel plans to crush ARM beyond 20 nm
KB3001   9/25/2012 10:54:07 PM
NO RATINGS
We believe you! :-) PS. This is not a matter of Intel vs. ARM folks. This is about long-term lower cost higher performance and open platforms vs. a return to the oligopolies of the past. The choice is clear...

Fraggle
User Rank
Author
re: Intel plans to crush ARM beyond 20 nm
Fraggle   9/25/2012 10:18:48 PM
NO RATINGS
Just seen the launch of two very competitive medfield based intel phones that outperform similar pricec arm devices and have aversge mobile battery performance. Here in Europe. And they were just proof of concept. Now chipzilla has the making of a true mobile device proc., 2+ yeafrs lead in process technology, gazillions cash on the balance sheet and more fab capability than tsmc and a few others put together.

Bruzzer
User Rank
Author
re: Intel plans to crush ARM beyond 20 nm
Bruzzer   9/25/2012 7:21:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Kresearch: More to consider . . . what is certain on Intel price sheet ATOM average price is up from RISK production phase on diriviative offerings. The question is where is average weighed price. Mike Bruzzone Camp Marketing

Bruzzer
User Rank
Author
re: Intel plans to crush ARM beyond 20 nm
Bruzzer   9/25/2012 7:09:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Kresearch: Intel attempted to get TSMC to fabricate ATOM at RISK production phase. However the two fabricator's process cost structures are similar. So at the time TSMC could not afford to fabricate Atom eiteher. I believe Atom costs have come down into the $0.25 per sq mm dice area but that is on Intel financial's check not economic assessment of the ATOM production long run. Mike Bruzzone Camp Marketing

Youself
User Rank
Author
re: Intel plans to crush ARM beyond 20 nm
Youself   9/25/2012 5:43:36 PM
NO RATINGS
what's not addressed in this article is that mfring node is not the only competitive dimension. The world does not start and stop solely with transistor current consumption. Architecture optimized for use cases can be a huge differentiator and more than make up for the gap in transistor vs transistor efficiency.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Intel plans to crush ARM beyond 20 nm
resistion   9/25/2012 1:04:39 AM
NO RATINGS
Apple could have two versions (x86 and ARM), to secure all the manufacturing bases.

Kresearch
User Rank
Author
re: Intel plans to crush ARM beyond 20 nm
Kresearch   9/25/2012 12:13:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Apple adopts Intel CPU in iMac already. It would be interesting to see intel replacing Samsung to take Apple's foundry order in 22nm SOC. I remembered TSMC licensed Intel's Atom core for mobile chip manufacturing about 2-3 years ago. Is there any progress update till now?

jg_
User Rank
Author
re: Intel plans to crush ARM beyond 20 nm
jg_   9/24/2012 10:55:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel is a manufacturer, and ARM is merely a license, so this is comparing apples and oranges. The difference is not the cores - end customers do not care about cores. Look at Apple, they managed to CHANGE cores entirely, and barely missed a beat, and support multiple cores now. The difference is in Manufacturing Capability, and there, intel really is the 600lb gorilla. A smarter question is could Apple team with intel, on a new design ?

<<   <   Page 4 / 6   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...