Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
GREATTerry
User Rank
Author
re: China Fabless: Rockchip rattled by Android tablet wars
GREATTerry   9/26/2012 12:16:33 AM
NO RATINGS
It is amazing to finish a chip design in just 2 months (started a chip in March, showed it in trade show in April and then shipped the samples in May). How much faster can they shorten the design cycle? I have no idea how innovation can take place if there is just little time for chip design to sit down to work, not even think. Personally, I don't think this can help the company to grow healthily and such strategy can't last long.

joepaiii
User Rank
Author
re: China Fabless: Rockchip rattled by Android tablet wars
joepaiii   9/26/2012 3:50:36 AM
NO RATINGS
I am a little doubtful about that timeline, you can't even make it through the fab in 30 days using an advanced node.

casual3
User Rank
Author
re: China Fabless: Rockchip rattled by Android tablet wars
casual3   9/26/2012 7:10:25 AM
NO RATINGS
Rockchip outsources most of the design work to GUC which is a TSMC affliate. My sources told me it usually takes 3 iterations (sometimes 4) to get it right. So the March to May time frame could be the 3rd try, which could be a simple metal change, or from MPW shuttle to full-mask.

gatorfan
User Rank
Author
re: China Fabless: Rockchip rattled by Android tablet wars
gatorfan   9/26/2012 3:57:38 PM
NO RATINGS
Wow, a single iteration at 28nm is expensive....3-4 of those blows my mind how these guys can be competitive at all in either cycle time or cost.

sranje
User Rank
Author
re: China Fabless: Rockchip rattled by Android tablet wars
sranje   9/26/2012 11:28:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Dear Junko, Another very informative article - many thanks. I do have an interesting question - since you are quoting Rockchip's CEO: The RK31xx is a dual core Cortex A9 product designed for tablets and smartphones. Using Globalfoundries' high-k 28-nm process, “we can reduce cost, gain performance, but most importantly, we will reduce power consumption for tablets,” said Chen Will the package interconnect for this application processor be Cu-wire wirebond or flip-chip bumps? I am curious how much wirebond for multi-core application processors even in 28nm. Many thanks in advance if you can find and provide the answer.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: China Fabless: Rockchip rattled by Android tablet wars
junko.yoshida   9/27/2012 10:44:23 AM
NO RATINGS
I think I am the guilty one here, not articulating this whole "design" process well in the story. I will correct the story accordingly. Meanwhile, here's an e-mail I just received from Rockchip's Chen. He clarified this for us as follows: "What I meant was, after we got the chip, we were able to get the chip in end products in less than 2 months."

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: China Fabless: Rockchip rattled by Android tablet wars
junko.yoshida   9/27/2012 10:54:40 AM
NO RATINGS
Hi, sranje. Rockchip's VP Chen just got back to me on your question. Here's what he wrote in his e-mail: "It’s not flipchip, still cu-wire bond, we are planning flipchip though."

Hiramalik
User Rank
Author
re: China Fabless: Rockchip rattled by Android tablet wars
Hiramalik   9/27/2012 11:57:24 AM
NO RATINGS
That's really awesome post and love to find more update about Android. For Job Opportunities in Pakistan visit http://hiring.rozee.pk/

sranje
User Rank
Author
re: China Fabless: Rockchip rattled by Android tablet wars
sranje   9/27/2012 2:18:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Dear Junko - thank you very much for publishing Rockchip CEO's reply to my question on the new 2-core A-9 application processor in 28nm. So it will be in wirebond. But with plans for flip-chip also.

junko.yoshida
User Rank
Author
re: China Fabless: Rockchip rattled by Android tablet wars
junko.yoshida   9/27/2012 2:53:33 PM
NO RATINGS
You're quite welcome. I am glad you asked the question and Rockchip's Chen came back to us with an answer!

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...