Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
casual3
User Rank
Rookie
re: TI steering OMAP to embedded
casual3   9/27/2012 4:31:44 AM
NO RATINGS
I guess TI's internal discussion ran like this: in 2015, smartphone market will be 1B+ units, Apple/Samsung will be 500M, Huawei will be 100M, all 3 are vertically integrated with their own OS and AP, so 600M units is already out of the question. for the remaining 400M units, at least 80% will be integrated baseband+AP for the mid-to-low-end, so TI is out. for the last 80M units AP, TI should compete with half a dozen strong competitors including Qualcomm, Mediatek, Spreadtrum, Broadcom, Nvidia, Marvell, etc. And I just forgot Intel.Also RDA will be a strong low-end AP competitor in 2015.

andyroyduh
User Rank
Rookie
re: TI steering OMAP to embedded
andyroyduh   9/27/2012 3:53:08 AM
NO RATINGS
Apple and Samsung don't seem to agree with Will Strauss' prediction. Do we really have a trend toward app processor/baseband integration if the top two suppliers (representing 49% of smartphones sold) don't participate. The real trend here is vertical integration.

DSJIANG
User Rank
Rookie
re: TI steering OMAP to embedded
DSJIANG   9/27/2012 3:14:10 AM
NO RATINGS
How about Qualcomm? If Apple and Samsung use their own AP, it means Qualcomm also loses business in high end smartphone. Moreover, MTK have won the business in China for low price of smartphone.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
re: TI steering OMAP to embedded
mcgrathdylan   9/26/2012 10:10:46 PM
NO RATINGS
PS- Will Strauss of Forward Concepts just reminded me that he has been predicting this since 2010. The trend is toward integrating the apps processor with the base band in smartphones, and with TI stopping development of baseband, the company has no chance. Qualcomm is already shipping Snapdragon with integrated baseband, and Nvidia plans to ship a Tegra with integrated baseband starting next year.

mcgrathdylan
User Rank
Blogger
re: TI steering OMAP to embedded
mcgrathdylan   9/26/2012 9:48:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Personally I was surprised about this, as OMAP appears to be scoring design wins, particularly in tablets. But the more I think about it, the more this makes sense. It's a crowded market, Apple and Samsung aren't buying, and the development is expensive. Seems OMAP could have more upside in embedded.

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Feast Your Orbs on My Jiggly Exercise Machine
Max Maxfield
50 comments
Last weekend, I was chatting with my mother on the phone. She's all excited that I'm coming over to visit for a week in November. "I'll be seeing you in only seven weeks," she trilled ...

latest comment kfield Toy....or agony? :-)
Glen Chenier

Missing Datasheet Details Can Cause Problems
Glen Chenier
3 comments
It is often said that "the devil is in the details." All too often those details are hidden deep within a datasheet, where you can easily overlook them. When a datasheet reference circuit ...

David Blaza

RadioShack: The End Is Nigh!
David Blaza
123 comments
I'm feeling a little nostalgic today as I read about what looks like the imminent demise of RadioShack, at least as we currently know it. An old ubiquitous cartoon image popped into my ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
47 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...