Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
askubel
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Apple crazy?
askubel   10/5/2012 2:55:56 PM
NO RATINGS
It's like they're implying the existence of a system that has the sole purpose of interpreting kinetic sensor and touchscreen data to modify the print settings. This is obviously absurd - the whole patent was clearly designed to use against competitors that happen to have print settings and gesture recognition on the same device. I think the problem lies with the nature of the patent office. The job is so boring that anyone with the ability/experience to recognize bogus patents would never work there.

BrianBailey
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Apple crazy?
BrianBailey   10/5/2012 3:22:35 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree with you. The whole notion of gesture control has been captured in movies for the longest time. That in my mind makes gesture control of anything pretty obvious.

BrianBailey
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Apple crazy?
BrianBailey   10/5/2012 3:26:11 PM
NO RATINGS
We have seen examples of using the engineering community to help with projects. Maybe this is the direction the patent office should go in. Make it easy for anyone to supply the patent office with prior art during the application process. Then the patents would never get issued rather than having to fight in court afterwards.

zooglen
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Apple crazy?
zooglen   10/5/2012 5:29:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Prior art: "Turn device upside-down and shake to erase screen." It was called an Etch-a-Sketch...

Battar
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Apple crazy?
Battar   10/6/2012 10:15:39 AM
NO RATINGS
You could probably find prior art for many new technologies in 1970s' episodes of "Star Trek". I find the patent system very frustrating, as our competitors are continously filing applications for the screamingly obvious, and examiners often allow patents that are both obvious and not novel. About 2 years ago one company filed a patent application for the use of an accelerometer as a tilt sensor. The European examiner couldn't find any prior art and allowed the patent!

Battar
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Apple crazy?
Battar   10/6/2012 10:17:24 AM
NO RATINGS
As of July this year, WIPO allows you to do this. The USPTO hasn't yet realized that the engineering community will happily do their work for them for free.

EREBUS0
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Apple crazy?
EREBUS0   10/6/2012 8:37:32 PM
NO RATINGS
Next they will claim a patent for breathing. I can't wait for the new bible to come out claiming Steve Jobs was the son of God. All hail and worship Apple. Give me a break.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: What were they thinking: Apple crazy?
Duane Benson   10/7/2012 4:26:42 AM
NO RATINGS
I think this is pretty cool. If I want to get salt out of a salt shaker, I turn it upside down and shake. Same thing if I want to get ketchup out of a ketchup bottle. It makes perfect sense that if I want to get my writing out of my computer, I should turn it upside down and shake. If I want to get excess butter off of my toast, I scrape it off with a knife or my finger. Again, it makes perfect sense to wipe it out of the computer with my finger or a knife. The big concern that I have surrounding this is if I will still be able to buy my favorite brand of salt, ketchup and bread if these patents are granted.

bwalker970
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Apple crazy?
bwalker970   10/8/2012 4:17:12 PM
NO RATINGS
Umm, you're missing the point that the patent examiner approved both patents. The patent system is broken in many ways including its impetus to disclosure of inventions in such lurid and cryptic detail in its own special language. It's a lawyer's paradise.

Tloose
User Rank
Rookie
re: What were they thinking: Apple crazy?
Tloose   10/9/2012 12:48:16 PM
NO RATINGS
These are patent APPLICATIONS, not granted patents.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

The 10 Commandments of Electronics
Max Maxfield
6 comments
My chum Rick Curl dropped into my office this morning. We had both decided that we desperately needed some face-to-face time to talk about the current Doctor Who (our feelings are mixed at ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).