Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
mepitsinfo
User Rank
Rookie
re: System-on-chip technology comes of age
mepitsinfo   9/1/2015 5:42:34 AM
NO RATINGS
For Details about System on Chip & other Tutorials Log on to..

https://www.mepits.com/

https://www.mepits.com/tutorial/421/Programmable-Devices/System-on-Chip

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: System-on-chip technology comes of age
resistion   10/13/2012 2:11:35 AM
NO RATINGS
I think only 10 nm atom may allow soc breakout against 28 nm but not 20 nm arm soc. Finfet doesn't benefit soc integration, just x86 CPU.

sranje
User Rank
Author
re: System-on-chip technology comes of age
sranje   10/8/2012 4:04:06 AM
NO RATINGS
Dear swu3 -- I tried to explain - most analysts made the same mistake !! Wi-Fi is NOT integrated in Snapdragon - there is a separate wireless connectivity combo IC - ALWAYS. Snapdragon only "supports" connectivity - whatever that may mean (frequently it means an attempt to counter and stop at an OEM Broadcom's absolute connectivity dominance)

sranje
User Rank
Author
re: System-on-chip technology comes of age
sranje   10/8/2012 2:23:58 AM
NO RATINGS
Perhaps, to keep things in a perspective, ARM annual run rate revenues are ~~$800M

swu3
User Rank
Author
re: System-on-chip technology comes of age
swu3   10/7/2012 6:35:19 PM
NO RATINGS
To Sranje, I am also not clear on this but it seems like ALL the new 28nm Snapdragon S4 parts also integrate 802.11a/b/g/n onto the SOC and these are shipping now from TSMC MSN8230/8630/8930/8260A/8660A/8960 APQ8060A/8064 while Intel's strategy is confusing. They published a research paper? I don't see anything shipping. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_%28system_on_chip%29 any insight would be appreciated

swu3
User Rank
Author
re: System-on-chip technology comes of age
swu3   10/7/2012 5:52:26 PM
NO RATINGS
I think the thesis is right. It is just shocking how badly Intel missed this SOC trend. Too much focus on raw transistor performance versus what mattered for making a low power SOC. Intel pushed both chips design and silicon technology is the right direction for high performance CPUs but not for low cost low power mobile SOCs. 5 years from now when Wintel falls, the lack so SOC focus will be the reason understood given for Intel blowing its near 2 decade cash printing monopoly position. TSMC, Apple, Samsung, Arm are perhaps the 4 best positioned companies.

sranje
User Rank
Author
re: System-on-chip technology comes of age
sranje   10/6/2012 7:39:00 PM
NO RATINGS
In Low-end smartphones BB+AP integration is a must - nobody contends that. A completely separate subject is Wi-Fi connectivity integration into processors. So far nobody achieved it - for several reasons. And a third subject is Intel's correct conclusion that wireless connectivity is the future in computing - hence astonishing but still engineering success of designing Wi-Fi radio entirely in digital domain (no longer analog - hence fully scalable). Its Atom will have it - whether Atom will also integrate phone modem (that is a BB) is again another fourth topic

song-chou-1
User Rank
Author
re: System-on-chip technology comes of age
song-chou-1   10/6/2012 5:43:49 PM
NO RATINGS
Sranje, I read it as to be relevant in SOC mobile market (outside of Apple and Samsung which we can not sell to since they mostly make their own), baseband and application processor integration on the same die is required. Reason Texas Instruments recently exited mobile SOC market. Also applies to Intel. Even if it has the best CPU with atom, Intel will not be relevant in mobile SOC market until baseband and CPU are integrate.

sranje
User Rank
Author
re: System-on-chip technology comes of age
sranje   10/6/2012 4:02:25 PM
NO RATINGS
A comment on ..."As a result, Qualcomm evolved its product line-up from standalone connectivity chips by adding an applications processor (Krait ....." If the author implies tha wireless connectiviti functions, and especially Wi0Fi, is integrated into Snapdragon application processors - he is mistaken (just like so many other analysts). The root cause are Qualcomm's functional diagrams and statements inficating Wi-Fi integration into application processor (Snapdragon is BB+AP integrated). Qualcomm's (and Marvell's, etc.) application processors only "support" their wireless Combos.Wi-Fi and phone BB are conflicting and their integration has not been achieved yet. Only Intel has been, as of yet experimentally, able to implement Wi-Fi in digital domai (hence fully scalable) -- in its pursuit of "wireless" Atom - an Atom with Wi-Fi built-in - probably to ne launched in 14nm in 2014/15



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...