Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
DMcCunney
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
DMcCunney   10/17/2012 7:50:22 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, the Alpha no longer exists because Intel bought it and stopped making it. DEC's demise is a little more complicated, as DEC had been selling of parts trying to stay alive before what was left was acquired by Compaq. Far that matter, DEC competitor Data General suffered a similar fate. They made the AViiON line, originally based on the Motorola 88000 RISC processor, and shifted to Intel when Motorola dropped the 88000. DG was eventually purchased by storage vendor EMC, who bought them to get the CLARiiON storage system, and promptly stopped making the computer. But yeah, it pays to be the 800lb gorilla. It's yet another acquisition made to buy and kill off a potential competitor.

Adele.Hars
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
Adele.Hars   10/16/2012 9:50:18 AM
NO RATINGS
Just by way of reminder, silicon photonics is very much an SOI-based technology. See http://www.advancedsubstratenews.com/tag/photonics/ for articles explaining the role of SOI in photonics by Intel, IBM, Luxtera, Sony and more.

Scott SG.
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
Scott SG.   10/15/2012 6:56:29 PM
NO RATINGS
I'm not disagreeing with your analysis, but the reason DEC no longer exists is that Intel bought it as part of the settlement of the patent lawsuit brought by DEC against Intel. Intel had no reason to keep producing the Alpha or keep the DEC name past the agreed period. It pays to be the 880 lb. gorilla.

DMcCunney
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
DMcCunney   10/15/2012 6:16:03 PM
NO RATINGS
@BobsUrUncle: It might be more accurate to say the *market* gave up on SPARC. SPARC is a RISC processor, and an outgrowth of rethinking the architecture of a CPU. Previous generations had all been CISC architectures, with huge instruction sets. But realization set in that most of those instructions weren't actually used because compilers didn't generate code that used them. Why not design a CPU with only the basic instructions from which others could be constructed, and concentrate on making them as fast as possible, then let compilers do the work? Sun created the SPARC. HP had Precision Architecture. DEC created the Alpha. AMD had the 29000. But takeup was limited to server space, and steady improvements by Intel ate into any advantages RISC possessed. CISC was just as fast as RISC, and was *cheaper*. Sun wasn't the only one who backed off. DEC no longer exists. HP moved away from PA to systems based on Intel architecture. AMD concentrated on being an alternate supplier of Intel architecture chips. Backing away from SPARC didn't kill Sun. Being unable to compete did. You can make an argument that developing SPARC used resources Sun might have better applied elsewhere. If I'm a customer looking at Sun servers, and I see SPARC and Intel-architecture Opteron models, they can do the same things, and Opteron is cheaper, which way do I jump? SPARC may well be technically superior, but customers aren't buying technical superiority - they're buying bang for the buck. If you offer a product that costs more, you better have something the *customer* will see as justification to pay the higher price. SPARC wasn't it.

TarraTarra!
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
TarraTarra!   10/15/2012 5:05:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks!

Mxv
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
Mxv   10/15/2012 3:56:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Let's see Apple has it's own HW (silicon, boards, and I/O specs) and SW (OS, and applications). Sounds vertically integrated to me. Only thing missing is manufacturing but if foxcon has more problems, this many change. Seems the pendulum has swung back the other way and the industry is still stuck in 'core competency' mode -- or rather chucking competency and innovation.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
rick merritt   10/15/2012 5:30:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Apparently on the marketing front Arista supports the buzzwords of SDN and actually supports some version of OpenFlow. But privately Andy believes OpenFlow is too limited, low level and incompatible with today's networks to gain traction. He does believe there will be more mangeable, configurable nets using some form of SDN with each major company probably doing their own API thing for the next several years.

TarraTarra!
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
TarraTarra!   10/15/2012 12:47:06 AM
NO RATINGS
I am curious on Andy's comments on openflow. I thought Arista was doing something similar or on the same lines so his comments deriding it does not make sense (to me), or am I missing something here.

TarraTarra!
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
TarraTarra!   10/15/2012 12:45:12 AM
NO RATINGS
It appears that Andy can get headline articles written based just on his hallway uterings! His comments on Sparc were referring to the vertical integration of silicon, system h/w and software. This is difficult for any company to keep delivering on. Being able to use the best of current breed of silicon and differentiating on the software is where the system companies are finding success.

Mxv
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
Mxv   10/13/2012 7:25:46 PM
NO RATINGS
Giving up on Sparc is one good reason why Sun doesn't exist as a solo company anymore. Pure lack of innovation will kill you in the end.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Most Recent Comments
michigan0
 
SteveHarris0
 
realjjj
 
SteveHarris0
 
SteveHarris0
 
VicVat
 
Les_Slater
 
SSDWEM
 
witeken
Most Recent Messages
9/25/2016
4:48:30 PM
michigan0 Sang Kim First, 28nm bulk is in volume manufacturing for several years by the major semiconductor companies but not 28nm FDSOI today yet. Why not? Simply because unlike 28nm bulk the LDD(Lightly Doped Drain) to minimize hot carrier generation can't be implemented in 28nm FDSOI. Furthermore, hot carrier reliability becomes worse with scaling, That is the major reason why 28nm FDSOI is not manufacturable today and will not be. Second, how can you suppress the leakage currents from such ultra short 7nm due to the short channel effects? How thin SOI thickness is required to prevent punch-through of un-dopped 7nm FDSOI? Possibly less than 4nm. Depositing such an ultra thin film less then 4nm filum uniformly and reliably over 12" wafers at the manufacturing line is extremely difficult or not even manufacturable. If not manufacturable, the 7nm FDSOI debate is over!Third, what happens when hot carriers are generated near the drain at normal operation of 7nm FDSOI? Electrons go to the positively biased drain with no harm but where the holes to go? The holes can't go to the substrate because of the thin BOX layer. Some holes may become trapped at the BOX layer causing Vt shift. However, the vast majority of holes drift through the the un-dopped SOI channel toward the N+Source,...
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
Once the base layer of a design has been taped out, making ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
The LTC2380-24 is a versatile 24-bit SAR ADC that combines ...
In this short video we show an LED light demo to ...
02:46
Wireless Power enables applications where it is difficult ...
07:41
LEDs are being used in current luxury model automotive ...
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...