Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
goafrit
User Rank
Manager
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
goafrit   10/11/2012 11:47:10 PM
NO RATINGS
optical waveguide is certainly a hot area and we expect that to continue.

dougwithau
User Rank
Manager
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
dougwithau   10/12/2012 8:55:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Do you mean like this? http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=31682

Mxv
User Rank
CEO
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
Mxv   10/13/2012 7:24:29 PM
NO RATINGS
What's Andy smoking these days? Apple would counter his merchant silicon argument and who's developing full custom chips these days except Intel and AMD. Most merchant silicon in networking are developed using standard cell ASIC libraries. He's got his head in the clouds these days. Arista will get absorbed into some other networking company if they keep reselling Intel reference designs. Using merchant silicon is good if you want to get to market quickly but you can't hold your lead relying on suppliers. All your competitors have access to the same silicon.

Mxv
User Rank
CEO
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
Mxv   10/13/2012 7:25:46 PM
NO RATINGS
Giving up on Sparc is one good reason why Sun doesn't exist as a solo company anymore. Pure lack of innovation will kill you in the end.

TarraTarra!
User Rank
CEO
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
TarraTarra!   10/15/2012 12:45:12 AM
NO RATINGS
It appears that Andy can get headline articles written based just on his hallway uterings! His comments on Sparc were referring to the vertical integration of silicon, system h/w and software. This is difficult for any company to keep delivering on. Being able to use the best of current breed of silicon and differentiating on the software is where the system companies are finding success.

TarraTarra!
User Rank
CEO
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
TarraTarra!   10/15/2012 12:47:06 AM
NO RATINGS
I am curious on Andy's comments on openflow. I thought Arista was doing something similar or on the same lines so his comments deriding it does not make sense (to me), or am I missing something here.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
rick merritt   10/15/2012 5:30:10 AM
NO RATINGS
Apparently on the marketing front Arista supports the buzzwords of SDN and actually supports some version of OpenFlow. But privately Andy believes OpenFlow is too limited, low level and incompatible with today's networks to gain traction. He does believe there will be more mangeable, configurable nets using some form of SDN with each major company probably doing their own API thing for the next several years.

Mxv
User Rank
CEO
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
Mxv   10/15/2012 3:56:09 PM
NO RATINGS
Let's see Apple has it's own HW (silicon, boards, and I/O specs) and SW (OS, and applications). Sounds vertically integrated to me. Only thing missing is manufacturing but if foxcon has more problems, this many change. Seems the pendulum has swung back the other way and the industry is still stuck in 'core competency' mode -- or rather chucking competency and innovation.

TarraTarra!
User Rank
CEO
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
TarraTarra!   10/15/2012 5:05:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Thanks!

DMcCunney
User Rank
CEO
re: Silicon photonics is hot, OpenFlow is not
DMcCunney   10/15/2012 6:16:03 PM
NO RATINGS
@BobsUrUncle: It might be more accurate to say the *market* gave up on SPARC. SPARC is a RISC processor, and an outgrowth of rethinking the architecture of a CPU. Previous generations had all been CISC architectures, with huge instruction sets. But realization set in that most of those instructions weren't actually used because compilers didn't generate code that used them. Why not design a CPU with only the basic instructions from which others could be constructed, and concentrate on making them as fast as possible, then let compilers do the work? Sun created the SPARC. HP had Precision Architecture. DEC created the Alpha. AMD had the 29000. But takeup was limited to server space, and steady improvements by Intel ate into any advantages RISC possessed. CISC was just as fast as RISC, and was *cheaper*. Sun wasn't the only one who backed off. DEC no longer exists. HP moved away from PA to systems based on Intel architecture. AMD concentrated on being an alternate supplier of Intel architecture chips. Backing away from SPARC didn't kill Sun. Being unable to compete did. You can make an argument that developing SPARC used resources Sun might have better applied elsewhere. If I'm a customer looking at Sun servers, and I see SPARC and Intel-architecture Opteron models, they can do the same things, and Opteron is cheaper, which way do I jump? SPARC may well be technically superior, but customers aren't buying technical superiority - they're buying bang for the buck. If you offer a product that costs more, you better have something the *customer* will see as justification to pay the higher price. SPARC wasn't it.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Max's BADASS Display: A Comedy of Errors
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
Good grief -- where does the time go? I first determined to build my Bodacious Acoustic Diagnostic Astoundingly Superior Spectromatic (BADASS) display way back in the mists of time we used ...

<b><a href=Betajet">

The Circle – The Future's Imperfect in the Present Tense
Betajet
5 comments
The Circle, a satirical, dystopian novel published in 2013 by San Francisco-based writer Dave Eggers, is about a large, very powerful technology company that combines aspects of Google, ...

Martin Rowe

Make This Engineering Museum a Reality
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
Vincent Valentine is a man on a mission. He wants to make the first house to ever have a telephone into a telephone museum. Without help, it may not happen.

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
16 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...