Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
lobomerchant
User Rank
Author
re: Industry View: Objective Analysis on Cypress, Ramtron
lobomerchant   10/19/2012 6:44:09 AM
NO RATINGS
So true is said by @Michael Lorello...many would look for some better simplified applications and other better stuff!!

Michael Lorello
User Rank
Author
re: Industry View: Objective Analysis on Cypress, Ramtron
Michael Lorello   10/18/2012 12:17:52 PM
NO RATINGS
I would definitely like to see memory technology like FRAM become more popular and cheaper. The benefits such as speed and EEPROM-like behavior such as byte-level modification but with orders of magnitude better endurance could greatly simplify applications that normally require wear-leveling and page-erase handling algorithms. Let's hope Cypress doesn't do anything to mess things up.

TarraTarra!
User Rank
Author
re: Industry View: Objective Analysis on Cypress, Ramtron
TarraTarra!   10/17/2012 11:42:07 PM
NO RATINGS
T.J Rodgers understands this market very well, I would not be surprised if he pulls off a sunpower with this deal.

Roadman0
User Rank
Author
re: Industry View: Objective Analysis on Cypress, Ramtron
Roadman0   10/17/2012 5:21:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Discrete SRAM market is a rapidly shrinking, even Samsung & NEC left the market, only GSI and Cypress are left. Cypress as company has issues, Ramtron is not a cure for this. Problems at company are large in scale around PSUC, PSUC is not a competitive product against fixed function MCU.

vapats
User Rank
Author
re: Industry View: Objective Analysis on Cypress, Ramtron
vapats   10/16/2012 11:21:48 AM
NO RATINGS
So, alternative memories remaining expensive and low-density is a self-fulfilling prophecy of the market? Or are these technologies (like FRAM) truly viable?



Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...