Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Youself
User Rank
Rookie
re: XMOS repositions itself as MCU company
Youself   3/4/2013 5:24:35 PM
NO RATINGS
and far more expensive... therein lies the rub

David Brown
User Rank
Rookie
re: XMOS repositions itself as MCU company
David Brown   10/18/2012 12:45:33 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, I know they have been active in bringing out new devices - the most recent ones having a USB 2.0 PHY integrated in the chip. However, there are least some architectural and software issues involved in using more than 64KB memory, so it is not quite as simple as putting a bigger SRAM macro in the design. So I'm not going to put money on bigger ram blocks in the next versions - but I would definitely like to see it in the future. The other big problems I see with the XMOS lie with their development tools and the limitations of the "XC" language. But it is quite possible that this has changed now with the new tools they have released - I haven't tried them, and it would be unfair to complain about old problems before checking if they are now fixed.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: XMOS repositions itself as MCU company
Peter Clarke   10/18/2012 12:01:43 PM
NO RATINGS
@David Brown You make a good point about lack of memory. CEO Nigel Toon indicated that more components are in the pipeline, but did not wish to tip his hand about what is coming in the next three to six months. So maybe XMOS is addressing that with a respin of silicon - or perhaps not. We wait to find out.

David Brown
User Rank
Rookie
re: XMOS repositions itself as MCU company
David Brown   10/18/2012 9:05:31 AM
NO RATINGS
The XMOS chips are a nice architecture, but they suffer greatly from a lack of memory. There is just 64K per core for both program and data, and no sensible way to connect external memories (you can make a memory interface in software, but that uses up most of the pins and resources on the device!). With at least 512 KB ram per core, and preferably with flash for bootloading on chip, these would be far more useful devices.

JB65
User Rank
Rookie
re: XMOS repositions itself as MCU company
JB65   10/17/2012 2:47:28 PM
NO RATINGS
x



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Book Review: Deadly Odds by Allen Wyler
Max Maxfield
10 comments
Generally speaking, when it comes to settling down with a good book, I tend to gravitate towards science fiction and science fantasy. Having said this, I do spend a lot of time reading ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).