Here is an article with preliminary benchmarks http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=calxeda_ubuntu_pre&num=1
Get one for yourself @ http://www.systemfabricworks.com/products/systemfabricore
I am told the Web 2.0 data centers have written much of their own code and done it for 64-bit data sets, but some enterprise Web server and other systems can squeak by on 32-bit code.
I believe there may be some third-party benchmarks f0or Calxeda out today. Anyone see them?
64b for them makes sense. Any idea on whether customers are signing up for the 32b processors.
The power measurement charts like the one in the article is questionable. It does not mention the performance or what workload was running on the webserver e.g. The ECX-1000 is low power - that is a given but what performance does it get?
Charts such as these make them lose credibility.
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.