It's always great to see your reactions from your seemingly constant travels, I must say, Brian (and the other contributors too!).
One problem my wife, a teacher, encountered often, is the school boards' single-minded insistence on sports, and consequent relative disinterest in what should really matter. She initially taught in rural Pennsylvania, where this phenomenon is particularly acute. Maybe similar in Georgia?
The great teachers really stand out, in such cases.
@Bert22306: I have to agree that emphasis on sports is overly misplaced in the US. The entertainment value from high school football games on Friday nights is so tiny and short-lived but the schools would rather pursue that than encouraging (&funding) science clubs!
Brian, I invite you to check out what this high school in Texas is doing. They have a great STEM academy program and a parent booster club for same (how many high schools have an engineering booster club?) The booster club holds an annual Engineering Expo which has turned into a major event.
Bert, your wife's experience is distressing to say the least, especially if k-12 school boards are emphasizing sports over academics... I get (but don't support) why colleges do it, but in K-12 it's a completely misplaced priority.
It must be that such rural areas don't see much economic transformation and that sports is an outlet. That said, the occasional visionary seems to show up and bring change. You can't change a local economy without building a talent base to draw from. Problem is there aren't enough visionaries or risk takers out there to make this happen at lots of school boards.
I think having a focus on either one or the other is equally unfortunate. Kids need a balanced education in school, including science, math, sport, art and language(s). If the quality of teachers across the board could be raised (something you only really achieve on a large scale by paying significantly more for their salaries), that would be a great start.
@gkidwell, wow. An engineering booster club! Are you a parent there? Are you headed to that event by any chance? If you are and have the inclination, I'd love to hear your thoughts after the fact! Let's keep the conversation moving.
I can see where folks here are coming from since many of you currently have kids in school (I don't). On the other hand (this is STRICTLY my opinion) it's next to criminally irresponsible AT THIS TIME to encourage students to enter a field where the job prospects are so bleak, then just "assume somehow" things will just automatically get better just prior to college graduation! I look at the cable industry sponsoring "robot building competitions" for high schoolers and I just about get sick to my stomach, the premise that we'll just go further down the path of putting out unlimited numbers of students with advanced engineering degrees only to have legions more hopelessly overqualified cable TV installers is a beyond pathetic vision of the future. I just wonder if the emphasis may be misplaced of getting kids educated when right now we have NO IDEA where the jobs will come from, and while corporate America just openly DOESN'T CARE how good the education of ANY American EE is, they INSIST that what they really need is more H1B visa to bring more engineers in from abroad because "US engineers are no good". Maybe this is the wrong blog for this but I believe the folks here need to hear this too.
Drones are, in essence, flying autonomous vehicles. Pros and cons surrounding drones today might well foreshadow the debate over the development of self-driving cars. In the context of a strongly regulated aviation industry, "self-flying" drones pose a fresh challenge. How safe is it to fly drones in different environments? Should drones be required for visual line of sight – as are piloted airplanes? Join EE Times' Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of drone experts.