Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: Changing the political system
Duane Benson   11/30/2012 6:34:38 AM
NO RATINGS
Personally, I've always thought that a little incompetence in government is a good thing. Too much is bad, but really efficient and competent governments will destroy civil rights. On balance the mass of government just wants to do their job and there are enough of them that want to do good to balance out the corrupt portions of it. That's why it more or less works here. The US was founded, in part, with the assumption that government is inherently flawed. That any government left to its own devices will likely end up oppressing it people. Our founders understood that government is necessary, but it needs inefficiency and oversight to keep it in check. Splitting power between the president, congress and the Supreme court, and then down into the states, is incredibly inefficient. Congress is even split in two. How many people and groups must agree to get anything done? A lot. It would be much, much more efficient to just have one person that can make all of the decisions without debate. That would be efficient, but horrible (think Stalin). Yes, our government is mired in mud most of the time, but that's an important aspect of the US government. It's supposed to be sluggish and inefficient.

shikantaza
User Rank
Rookie
re: Changing the political system
shikantaza   11/8/2012 7:43:04 PM
NO RATINGS
I like the idea of a starting date for campaigning. People currently in office have too much to do these days, and the public does get a tad weary. I'd also align the primaries so that smaller states could go early to weed out the real flakes and dangerous loonies. As a SoCal boy, I say we keep New Hampshire to go first, just to hold with a small tradition. So, start in March. First primaries in May. Conventions in August. Vote in November. 8 months. Sounds like plenty o' time to me. Or, we could do it with physical contests, as in Gulliver's Travels....

shikantaza
User Rank
Rookie
re: Changing the political system
shikantaza   11/8/2012 7:37:36 PM
NO RATINGS
NO ENGINEERS for president. Herbert Hoover was an engineer: ran the economy straight to the toilet. Jimmy Carter was an engineer. He is a Good Man, but was a terrible president.

David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
re: Changing the political system
David Ashton   11/7/2012 11:23:29 PM
NO RATINGS
ButYouDoUseTheForumSoWhyNotPickABetterName?

David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
re: Changing the political system
David Ashton   11/7/2012 11:22:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Naaah...it's tough enough getting electronics to do what I want....an electorate would be much worse (even though they start the same... :-) Others have pointed out other reasons below - and as Erebus says, "Good Luck..."

ljp93105
User Rank
Rookie
re: Changing the political system
ljp93105   11/5/2012 6:28:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Why do engineers not run for office? Because we can look ahead and see how unpleasant it is. The cost of a congressional campaign is now about three times the total salary received while in office. In other words, only corrupt people can win. If you figure out a way to fix that without severely rewriting the "free speech" provisions of the constitution, let me know.

IDontUseTheForumSoWhyAmIForc
User Rank
Rookie
re: Changing the political system
IDontUseTheForumSoWhyAmIForc   11/5/2012 5:34:51 PM
NO RATINGS
I would change the accountabilty of the participants. In particular, the Supreme Court has ruled that candidates are not legally liable to perform on any promises they make during the campaigning. In other words, the court allows them to lie to win your vote. Since we elect the candidates based on these promises, it doesn't give me much faith in the entire system.

EREBUS0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Changing the political system
EREBUS0   11/4/2012 9:17:07 PM
NO RATINGS
David brings up a good point. If we engineers can do better, then why do we not run for office? You cannot change Washington by just complaining. Unfortunately, you still have to convince the remaining idiots to vote for you. Good luck.

BrianBailey
User Rank
Blogger
re: Changing the political system
BrianBailey   11/2/2012 2:22:59 PM
NO RATINGS
Are you telling me that you plan to run for election David?

David Ashton
User Rank
Blogger
re: Changing the political system
David Ashton   11/2/2012 2:24:57 AM
NO RATINGS
@ Brian - "what changes would you make?" Get engineers (who CAN do stuff) to run the place rather than lawyers and other parasites who seem unable to DO anything...... (And to forestall any criticism - "The power of accurate observation is often called cynicism byt those who do not have it" - George Bernard Shaw, Playwright and Author)

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
7 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).