Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Joe56
User Rank
Author
re: Using nvSRAMs for power-fail reliability in enterprise SSDs
Joe56   11/27/2012 4:09:39 PM
NO RATINGS
MRAM is a proven solution for protection of data in the event of system power loss because it is inherently non-volatile, there is no additional time needed to write data to a secondary non-volatile array, it simplifies the controller design, offers the speed of RAM and has superior endurance. MRAM is processed using standard CMOS base wafers to provide low cost as well as lower overall TCO to the user. Everspin, the leader in MRAM technology,announced customer sampling of the world's first commercial Spin Torque MRAM in a 64Mb density with a DDR3 interface. Now in one device the user can have power fail safety, non-volatility, DRAM DDR3 compatibility, with ultra low latency. With MRAM users can choose between SRAM like interface with existing products in volume production as well as look to the future with ST-MRAM in DRAM like interfaces.

Pramodh_Cypress
User Rank
Author
re: Using nvSRAMs for power-fail reliability in enterprise SSDs
Pramodh_Cypress   11/13/2012 6:20:16 PM
NO RATINGS
32Mb-128Mb will be on advanced technology nodes and should have reasonable die sizes.

lwang61
User Rank
Author
re: Using nvSRAMs for power-fail reliability in enterprise SSDs
lwang61   11/12/2012 4:31:03 AM
NO RATINGS
Would 32Mb-128Mb nvSRAM have incredible large die sizes using 130nm technology node?

Pramodh_Cypress
User Rank
Author
re: Using nvSRAMs for power-fail reliability in enterprise SSDs
Pramodh_Cypress   11/8/2012 8:36:21 PM
NO RATINGS
Neale, 16Mb is planned for first quarter of 2013, with 32Mb in fourth quarter. 16Mb devices are on 130nm node. Based on the future requirements and feedback from customers, the density requirement would be in the range of 32Mb - 128Mb. We have not evaluated PCM as a major competitor. I will check on PCM and get back to you.

Pramodh_Cypress
User Rank
Author
re: Using nvSRAMs for power-fail reliability in enterprise SSDs
Pramodh_Cypress   11/8/2012 8:31:18 PM
NO RATINGS
nvSRAM is completely on the standard CMOS manufacturing process and this is a big advantage in terms of both cost, manufacturability and supplier reliability. MRAM, on the other hand is on a non-standard process, which translates to higher costs. SSD write cache density would be in 100s of MBs to GBs range, but only a portion of that data (metadata) needs to be backed-up reliably on power loss and that is where nvSRAM solution comes in. Replacing all of the SDRAM write cache with nvSRAM would be the ideal solution. But, those densities are currently out of reach.

CMathas
User Rank
Author
re: Using nvSRAMs for power-fail reliability in enterprise SSDs
CMathas   11/8/2012 6:31:26 PM
NO RATINGS
Stay tuned, I've let the author know that there are questions. They should respond shortly.

R G.Neale
User Rank
Author
re: Using nvSRAMs for power-fail reliability in enterprise SSDs
R G.Neale   11/6/2012 5:54:02 PM
NO RATINGS
Pramodh a couple of questions. What is the timeline for bit capacity greater than the 16-Mbit planned for production in the first quarter of 2013. What is the lithographic node for the 16-Mbit you (Cypress) are now sampling? Looking at the future requirements of enterprise SSDs enterprise servers, what in your view is likely to be the bit capacity requirement for SRAM or your nvSRAM? What is your view of PCM as a competitor for this SSD role?

DougInRB
User Rank
Author
re: Using nvSRAMs for power-fail reliability in enterprise SSDs
DougInRB   11/6/2012 5:35:06 PM
NO RATINGS
How does an nvSRAM compare with the new MRAM technology in terms of cost and reliability? It seems that MRAM is ultimately a better solution, since it is non volatile, does not require a data transfer, and does not require a back-up power source. MRAM also has SRAM-like interfaces and timing... Clearly, nvSRAM has an advantage in terms of density, but how much is actually required for a an SSD write cache?



Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST
Overview: Battle-hardened veterans of the electronics industry have heard of the “connected car” so often that they assume it’s a done deal. But do we really know what it takes to get a car connected and what its future entails? Join EE Times editor Junko Yoshida as she moderates a panel of movers and shakers in the connected car business. Executives from Cisco, Siemens and NXP will share ideas, plans and hopes for connected cars and their future. After the first 30 minutes of the radio show, our listeners will have the opportunity to ask questions via live online chat.
Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...