Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
freerunaushop
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple mulls switch away from Intel chips
freerunaushop   12/16/2012 10:33:45 AM
NO RATINGS
Excellent feedback with intriguing matters and very useful resources. Thanks for sharing. http://www.freerunaushop.com/

carolinesmith
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple mulls switch away from Intel chips
carolinesmith   11/18/2012 6:31:20 PM
NO RATINGS
I agree with Eric.Wertz, it never been the case. http://www.uggcanadamart.com/

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple mulls switch away from Intel chips
resistion   11/8/2012 12:39:18 PM
NO RATINGS
There's the SoC school and then there's the SiP school. Maybe Apple is still deciding where to enroll...

danny1024
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple mulls switch away from Intel chips
danny1024   11/8/2012 1:09:30 AM
NO RATINGS
Integration is really the key challenge and it's unclear that Apple can or wants to do that. Intel's recent Digital RF on CMOS Atom SOC ("Rosepoint") is the first of its kind; no one else has demonstrated that level of integration on a modern process tech node.

TarraTarra!
User Rank
CEO
re: Apple mulls switch away from Intel chips
TarraTarra!   11/7/2012 8:14:03 PM
NO RATINGS
The node advantage is expected to reduce going forward if not go away. Smaller technology shrinks (22nm-14nm) are not providing the dramatic reduction in power or increase in frequency anymore. So if the Apple design team can get close to intel performance with better integration of other functions, the management would take that and get a huge improvement in margins. Remember that Apple is already pretty much vertically integrated already.

danny1024
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple mulls switch away from Intel chips
danny1024   11/7/2012 6:43:19 PM
NO RATINGS
Apple's recent hires suggest that a TSMC move (for a portion of Apple's foundry needs) is imminent.

jeffreyrdiamond
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple mulls switch away from Intel chips
jeffreyrdiamond   11/7/2012 4:29:56 PM
NO RATINGS
The "architecture" (x86 vs ARM) is irrelevant. x86 is actually a disadvantage, but a minor one, as all Intel chips since the Pentium immediately translate x86 into an ARM like RISC ISA. What's left is microarchitecture and circuit technology. Of these, Intel currently leads in absolute performance per core, while ARM leads in performance per watt, which translates into throughput performance.

wsw1982
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple mulls switch away from Intel chips
wsw1982   11/7/2012 11:07:06 AM
NO RATINGS
This news must be originated from bloomberg,they has the reputation :) http://semiaccurate.com/2012/10/08/bloomberg-wrong-about-intels-woes/

vdara
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple mulls switch away from Intel chips
vdara   11/7/2012 1:50:26 AM
NO RATINGS
Any idea for Apple planning to switch from Samsung to TSMC/GF or even Intel?

danny1024
User Rank
Rookie
re: Apple mulls switch away from Intel chips
danny1024   11/6/2012 9:33:54 PM
NO RATINGS
Samsung is doing foundry work as well as some design-for-manufacturability and post-silicon validation/verification; Intel, Global Foundries and TSMC can easily do the same.

Page 1 / 3   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

The 10 Commandments of Electronics
Max Maxfield
19 comments
My chum Rick Curl dropped into my office this morning. We had both decided that we desperately needed some face-to-face time to talk about the current Doctor Who (our feelings are mixed at ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).