Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Moshe.Frankel
User Rank
Rookie
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
Moshe.Frankel   6/18/2013 6:46:15 PM
NO RATINGS
John.Donovan - NO!. GG - Very true! Intel's understand that their strength is in the fabs. The investment in 14 was not a waste - Intel is poised to take over Mobile even with the current node and sticking with FAB development can produce more than any other investment they can make. Fables is vulnerable in the long run to automated design, FPGA and changing standards as the latest Intel moves will probably show. Instead of Smith I think that it is Jerry who will end up correct. By the way AMD and Global are watching the Intel's moves in Mobile and will probably make a move for it too.

ChipMaster0
User Rank
Rookie
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
ChipMaster0   4/21/2013 4:21:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Qualcomm is killing it lately, and has become the 3rd lagest chip maker already [1], with only upside from now on. The only real competitor to them is Samsung now, if they decide to become more serious about dominating the market with Exynos chips. So far they seem to be using them more like "nice to have" chips, only in some of their devices. [1] - http://techdomino.com/qualcomm-3rd-biggest-chip-maker-by-revenue

agk
User Rank
Rookie
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
agk   11/21/2012 11:39:36 AM
NO RATINGS
Many commented on the fab and fab less models of the business.But both have their merits and demerits. So the best is to do the business with both.

Mitesh.Raval
User Rank
Rookie
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
Mitesh.Raval   11/19/2012 3:36:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel is too late for mobile just like MSFT. MSFT has however finally got it right and has a nice story going with Xbox, pc, mobile all providing similar UI. Also, msft has caught up to the competition and then some. Intel has a tougher problem to solve. They should spin off the fabs.

hazydave
User Rank
Manager
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
hazydave   11/13/2012 6:50:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Also one reason most other companies have given up the Intel practice of short-lived foundries. Intel's business case is kind of an odd-one, anyway... they're after 14nm to keep x86 competitive in mobile against ARM, predicated on the idea of ARM not actually getting even more serious on low power, and of ARM trailing x86 in process. Those were good bets up until now, but then again, Intel is only now starting to nip at ARM's mobile heels.

song-chou-1
User Rank
Rookie
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
song-chou-1   11/13/2012 1:57:46 AM
NO RATINGS
To GroovyGreek, My thoughts used to be like you But I can tell you it is cheaper to buy wafers/chips at foundry then use Intel internal manufacturing. How can be? Take TSMC 180nm today. TSMC 180nm 1st came on line 10 years ago making Qualcomm modem chips. 10 years later its now used for PMIC and other chips. Between modems and PMIC, many many other chips were made. 10 years from now TSMC will likely still be making chips (analog?, medical device chips? or something else). Compare and contrast to IDM Intel 's 180nm capacity is scrapped. All Intel's 90nm 65nm and 45nm is even scrapped. 32nm is being scrapped soon. Now think about this. Intel is spending about $30B US dollars to outfit plants for 22nm and 14nm. Just look out 4 years (Intel's roadmap) when it moves to 450mm wafers at 10nm or 7nm . All that $30B will be scrapped in 4 years. What a expense. Foundry is much more efficient since it makes many many more chips over far longer time.

GroovyGeek
User Rank
CEO
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
GroovyGeek   11/12/2012 6:59:16 PM
NO RATINGS
I am sorry, but the fabless model still relies on SOMEONE having a fab. The whole concept that you can somehow draw excess profit by passing your fab costs on someone else is rather ludicrous. Why would TSMC enable Qualcomm with leading edge process technology if they did not capture a fair portion of the profit? With the fab options of the Qualcomm's of the world shrinking expect to see their wafer costs go up. The fabless model only works for as long as the fab is more or less a commodity.

John.Donovan
User Rank
Manager
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
John.Donovan   11/12/2012 4:35:23 PM
NO RATINGS
I can't resist a shout out to Rodney Smith for pioneering the fabless model over hoots from the "Real men have fabs!" camp. The model has long since been validated, but I'm sorry Rodney isn't still around to savor the latest vindication of his vision.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
Peter Clarke   11/12/2012 9:44:00 AM
NO RATINGS
Interesting stuff Mobileman1

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
resistion   11/12/2012 2:13:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Here is the original Irish Times article: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/finance/2012/1109/1224326364155.html Possibly they are cutting training costs, which means Intel is facing tight money conditions now. Yet a quicker ramp to 14 nm wouldn't help? Maybe 14 nm is a small problem compared to something else..

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
9 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).