Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Moshe.Frankel
User Rank
Author
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
Moshe.Frankel   6/18/2013 6:46:15 PM
NO RATINGS
John.Donovan - NO!. GG - Very true! Intel's understand that their strength is in the fabs. The investment in 14 was not a waste - Intel is poised to take over Mobile even with the current node and sticking with FAB development can produce more than any other investment they can make. Fables is vulnerable in the long run to automated design, FPGA and changing standards as the latest Intel moves will probably show. Instead of Smith I think that it is Jerry who will end up correct. By the way AMD and Global are watching the Intel's moves in Mobile and will probably make a move for it too.

ChipMaster0
User Rank
Author
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
ChipMaster0   4/21/2013 4:21:35 PM
NO RATINGS
Qualcomm is killing it lately, and has become the 3rd lagest chip maker already [1], with only upside from now on. The only real competitor to them is Samsung now, if they decide to become more serious about dominating the market with Exynos chips. So far they seem to be using them more like "nice to have" chips, only in some of their devices. [1] - http://techdomino.com/qualcomm-3rd-biggest-chip-maker-by-revenue

agk
User Rank
Author
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
agk   11/21/2012 11:39:36 AM
NO RATINGS
Many commented on the fab and fab less models of the business.But both have their merits and demerits. So the best is to do the business with both.

Mitesh.Raval
User Rank
Author
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
Mitesh.Raval   11/19/2012 3:36:34 PM
NO RATINGS
Intel is too late for mobile just like MSFT. MSFT has however finally got it right and has a nice story going with Xbox, pc, mobile all providing similar UI. Also, msft has caught up to the competition and then some. Intel has a tougher problem to solve. They should spin off the fabs.

hazydave
User Rank
Author
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
hazydave   11/13/2012 6:50:53 PM
NO RATINGS
Also one reason most other companies have given up the Intel practice of short-lived foundries. Intel's business case is kind of an odd-one, anyway... they're after 14nm to keep x86 competitive in mobile against ARM, predicated on the idea of ARM not actually getting even more serious on low power, and of ARM trailing x86 in process. Those were good bets up until now, but then again, Intel is only now starting to nip at ARM's mobile heels.

song-chou-1
User Rank
Author
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
song-chou-1   11/13/2012 1:57:46 AM
NO RATINGS
To GroovyGreek, My thoughts used to be like you But I can tell you it is cheaper to buy wafers/chips at foundry then use Intel internal manufacturing. How can be? Take TSMC 180nm today. TSMC 180nm 1st came on line 10 years ago making Qualcomm modem chips. 10 years later its now used for PMIC and other chips. Between modems and PMIC, many many other chips were made. 10 years from now TSMC will likely still be making chips (analog?, medical device chips? or something else). Compare and contrast to IDM Intel 's 180nm capacity is scrapped. All Intel's 90nm 65nm and 45nm is even scrapped. 32nm is being scrapped soon. Now think about this. Intel is spending about $30B US dollars to outfit plants for 22nm and 14nm. Just look out 4 years (Intel's roadmap) when it moves to 450mm wafers at 10nm or 7nm . All that $30B will be scrapped in 4 years. What a expense. Foundry is much more efficient since it makes many many more chips over far longer time.

GroovyGeek
User Rank
Author
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
GroovyGeek   11/12/2012 6:59:16 PM
NO RATINGS
I am sorry, but the fabless model still relies on SOMEONE having a fab. The whole concept that you can somehow draw excess profit by passing your fab costs on someone else is rather ludicrous. Why would TSMC enable Qualcomm with leading edge process technology if they did not capture a fair portion of the profit? With the fab options of the Qualcomm's of the world shrinking expect to see their wafer costs go up. The fabless model only works for as long as the fab is more or less a commodity.

John.Donovan
User Rank
Author
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
John.Donovan   11/12/2012 4:35:23 PM
NO RATINGS
I can't resist a shout out to Rodney Smith for pioneering the fabless model over hoots from the "Real men have fabs!" camp. The model has long since been validated, but I'm sorry Rodney isn't still around to savor the latest vindication of his vision.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Author
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
Peter Clarke   11/12/2012 9:44:00 AM
NO RATINGS
Interesting stuff Mobileman1

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Qualcomm overtakes Intel in market capitalization
resistion   11/12/2012 2:13:32 AM
NO RATINGS
Here is the original Irish Times article: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/finance/2012/1109/1224326364155.html Possibly they are cutting training costs, which means Intel is facing tight money conditions now. Yet a quicker ramp to 14 nm wouldn't help? Maybe 14 nm is a small problem compared to something else..

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Are the design challenges the same as with embedded systems, but with a little developer- and IT-skills added in? What do engineers need to know? Rick Merritt talks with two experts about the tools and best options for designing IoT devices in 2016. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...