Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 3 / 4   >   >>
John_Galt
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why the ARM architecture is shaped the way it is
John_Galt   11/28/2012 3:33:48 PM
NO RATINGS
@Jack...go easy on our friend chipmonk. For the past 50 years public education here in the States has atrophied the curricula so badly that many "students" couldn't find England on a map. I work with younger BS/MSEEs who cannot even compose a coherent paragraph...they're not stupid, in fact many are quite bright, it's just that the system has failed them.

jackOfManyTrades
User Rank
Manager
re: Why the ARM architecture is shaped the way it is
jackOfManyTrades   11/28/2012 9:02:54 AM
NO RATINGS
and my country is not called "England" anymore than the US is called "Texas".

jackOfManyTrades
User Rank
Manager
re: Why the ARM architecture is shaped the way it is
jackOfManyTrades   11/28/2012 9:01:55 AM
NO RATINGS
De-industrialised? Uncompetaive? Take a look at this PWC report: http://www.pwc.co.uk/assets/pdf/ukmanufacturing-300309.pdf "There is a widespread assumption that the final demise of manufacturing in the UK is only a matter of time. But this is simply not so. The facts tell a different story: • Output of British manufacturing reached an all-time high in 2007, even adjusted for inflation • The UK is the world’s 6th largest manufacturer with strong positions in certain key industries, e.g. a 15% global market share in Aerospace • UK Manufacturing achieved a 50% increase in labour productivity from 1997-2007"

agk
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why the ARM architecture is shaped the way it is
agk   11/28/2012 6:26:01 AM
NO RATINGS
The article is interesting to read. It is electronics history. While reading visualize the same and many interesting thoughts comes to my mind. Here the heroes live a student cum professional life.

Kevin Neilson
User Rank
Manager
re: Why the ARM architecture is shaped the way it is
Kevin Neilson   11/28/2012 3:43:44 AM
NO RATINGS
The story isn't too clear on this, but Roger Wilson and Sophie Wilson are the same person. The 65C02! What a nice processor.

rick merritt
User Rank
Author
re: Why the ARM architecture is shaped the way it is
rick merritt   11/27/2012 11:31:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Nice telling of a piece of microprocessor history. The lesson, Just say, "Yes!"

TanjB
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why the ARM architecture is shaped the way it is
TanjB   11/27/2012 10:42:06 PM
NO RATINGS
ARM in early 90s was not so much in advance of other chips, especially MIPS, and MIPS sold a lot more. Hauser forgot one other essential thing he gave ARM: no customers. So when the mobile industry was ready to build SOCs, there was ARM with a suitable chip, fabless portable design, and no other business model to distract them. It was their one lifeline, and it proved to be a bonanza. The dominant competitor capable of providing a choice at the time, MIPS, was very successful elsewhere and by the time phones were big enough business for them to become concerned, ARM had a lock. These days, ARM is part of SOCs with billions of transistors just like x86. The difference is in balance: in the ARM ecosystem the die is shared with IP like GPUs, modems, and half a dozen other blocks which have formed a healthy ecosystem. x86 is elbowing in: will it have more success now than MIPS 15 years ago?

MikeSantarini
User Rank
Manager
re: Why the ARM architecture is shaped the way it is
MikeSantarini   11/27/2012 10:22:11 PM
NO RATINGS
Great article, Peter.

rogkru
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why the ARM architecture is shaped the way it is
rogkru   11/27/2012 9:13:42 PM
NO RATINGS
Was the ferranti ULA a sea-of-gates with a metal top layer - or was it actually an eraly FPGA ? Google found this... chances are google run on thousands of Intel processors.... ironic. http://tinyurl.com/ferranti-ULA-problems-delay

John_Galt
User Rank
Rookie
re: Why the ARM architecture is shaped the way it is
John_Galt   11/27/2012 8:48:24 PM
NO RATINGS
Thank goodness for those 10 Billion transistor giants. Want to try running SolidWorks or AnSYS' Maxwell on even the most powerful ARM8 (if they were even available)? Comparing ARM and Intel architectures is like comparing helicopters with automobiles - they both have areas where they are a great fit - but neither address the full universe of applications.

<<   <   Page 3 / 4   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Curiosity Killed the Cat (Just Call Me Mr. Curiosity)
Max Maxfield
23 comments
My wife, Gina The Gorgeous, loves animals. She has two stupid dogs and two stupid cats. How stupid are they? Well, allow me to show you this video of the dogs that I made a couple of years ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
13 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).