Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Paul Glaubitz
User Rank
Author
re: We should pay for patents by the pound
Paul Glaubitz   12/10/2012 7:34:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Were this put into effect I'd predict many patents for high density ink (probably lead, murcury bases...)

me3
User Rank
Author
re: We should pay for patents by the pound
me3   12/7/2012 10:17:19 PM
NO RATINGS
This is the most Communistic reading of the US Constitution I have ever seen. Yeah, put 'em in doungons and let 'em invent for the Progress. It had been tried before somewhere, Comrade, it did not work out.

przemek0
User Rank
Author
re: We should pay for patents by the pound
przemek0   12/7/2012 10:01:37 PM
NO RATINGS
Nope, the US Constitution only talks about promoting "the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries". In other words, it protects the Progress of Science and Arts, not the inventors! The copyright and patent protections are just a way of ensuring such Progress. The important corollary is that if the system is failing to do that, the Constitution requires that it be changed.

lakehermit
User Rank
Author
re: We should pay for patents by the pound
lakehermit   12/7/2012 7:32:57 PM
NO RATINGS
Let me know when you have finished executing that great idea and have a working product. I'll be happy to sell them and pocket the money since you obviously don't mind sharing.

apummer945
User Rank
Author
re: We should pay for patents by the pound
apummer945   12/7/2012 5:21:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, you could see where is the US innovation today, that has to do somewhat how inventors get gratified for their work,since in most cases they get much less than the lawyer who files the patent with the patent office.

Jayna Sheats
User Rank
Author
re: We should pay for patents by the pound
Jayna Sheats   12/7/2012 5:17:13 PM
NO RATINGS
As the CTO of an electronics startup, I would be quite happy to see patents abolished. They are a game at best, and a diversion from really pertinent innovation. As to "what do we have left?", the answer is our wits, our ability to actually execute the great idea, and the effectiveness of the team of people who are going to do it (or not). There is greater value there than in a court fight.

me3
User Rank
Author
re: We should pay for patents by the pound
me3   12/7/2012 2:13:28 AM
NO RATINGS
There is a rigorous process to determine what an invention is. It may not be perfect but beats “in my head a long time ago” or “obvious by hindsight” by far. Some engineering options can lead to unexpected results and make a lot of money for the business. These are worth protecting while theories are not. If monopolies don’t explore these options, startups will, and do it with the protection of the US patent law. This is why US is still innovating. It is misguided for engineers to join the chorus for weakening the US patent system. For when that is gone, you will be living in a dorm with anti-suicide net around it.

old account Frank Eory
User Rank
Author
re: We should pay for patents by the pound
old account Frank Eory   12/6/2012 11:46:36 PM
NO RATINGS
You hit the nail on the head with "What constitutes an invention?" Something that seems innovative to a layman is often, as you said, just differences in engineering choices, or minor tweaks to an existing invention that are obvious to those skilled in the art but not claimed by the patent on the earlier invention. In summarizing the problem, I would modify your last sentence as follows: "Protecting solutions to problems that anyone could or already has figured out without assistance distorts the economics for everyone."

Bert22306
User Rank
Author
re: We should pay for patents by the pound
Bert22306   12/6/2012 8:51:29 PM
NO RATINGS
I am as opposed as anyone else, to the ridiculousness of many of the much-hyped patent litigation cases. But quite honestly, in this era in which developed countries have gotten away from manufacturing to such a large extent, rights to your intellectual property is pretty much all we have left. It's easier when your IP ends up in a wigit that you manufacture. The simple fact is, that model doesn't work anymore. So scoff all you like, guys, but what do we have left?

krisi
User Rank
Author
re: We should pay for patents by the pound
krisi   12/6/2012 6:00:06 PM
NO RATINGS
I love it Rick, brilliant!

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
NEXT UPCOMING BROADCAST
In conjunction with unveiling of EE Times’ Silicon 60 list, journalist & Silicon 60 researcher Peter Clarke hosts a conversation on startups in the electronics industry. One of Silicon Valley's great contributions to the world has been the demonstration of how the application of entrepreneurship and venture capital to electronics and semiconductor hardware can create wealth with developments in semiconductors, displays, design automation, MEMS and across the breadth of hardware developments. But in recent years concerns have been raised that traditional venture capital has turned its back on hardware-related startups in favor of software and Internet applications and services. Panelists from incubators join Peter Clarke in debate.
Most Recent Comments
resistion
 
resistion
 
resistion
 
R_Colin_Johnson
 
David Ashton
 
David Ashton
 
David Ashton
 
David Ashton
 
Ron Neale
Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Special Video Section
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...