Embedded Systems Conference
Breaking News
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
User Rank
re: IBM, Intel face off at 22 nm
bruzzer2   12/12/2012 7:14:39 AM
Search web for TSMC & Intel wafer output. 2011 TSMC states 12,970,000 300 millimeter wafers are 1.5 times more than Intel or 8,646,667. Searched for Intel 3rd party estimate, time was passing, stated TSMC. TSMC 2011 Gross Revenue 14,540,000,000 / 12,970,000 = $498.24 TSMC 2011 Net Revenue $5,100,000,000 / 12,970,000 = $175 Intel 2011 Gross Revenue $59,999,000,000 / 8,646,667 = $6,936 Intel 2011 Net Revenue $12,942,000,000 / 8,646,667 = $1,497 Intel Gross Revenue per Wafer is 14x TSMC Intel Net Revenue per Wafer is 3x TSMC But no this is not what I meant by Intel cooking the books. Most blatant is misrepresentation that annual cooperative advertising expense is marketing cost 1993 to 2011 totaling $29,786,000,000. That marketing cost is actually a combination of IDM customer’s rebated fee accruals known as Intel Inside tied charge back metered price discrimination and sales rewards for loyalty. In tied charge back form total sum is a kick through paid by PC IDMs taken as rebated fee accrual by Intel on sales price passed through by Intel to sales agents for channel stocks movement reporting. As marketing kick back to sales agents is cost at 5.15% of in system processor price stuck to PC end buyer as hidden charge in sales invoice. Another irregularity for economists, financiers, investors, competitors, customers is calculating extended Intel story problems that are processor shipment leaks through Intel and press sources for determining revenues and margins quarters into future time. This form of RICO known as collusion by model places Intel gross revenue higher than Intel stated, appears to over report data center revenue and under report PC client group revenue. Alternatively QUANTA higher revenue difference can be sign of poor yield, unsold inventory, unreported revenues concealing unreported cost centers, to offset product priced less than cost, employee and stakeholder theft. Mike Bruzzone Camp Marketing

Red Hog
User Rank
re: IBM, Intel face off at 22 nm
Red Hog   12/11/2012 7:53:00 PM
Hi Mike How do you mean Intel is cooking the books? Are you suggesting their GM is higher than it appears? I remember reading an EET article saying their costs per wafer are three times as high as TSMC.

User Rank
re: IBM, Intel face off at 22 nm
bruzzer2   12/11/2012 5:24:09 PM
I agree with 3D guy for Intel standard merchant product. Where SOCs do present another question including for Intel. For any standard product short run through five quarters of production requires a very volume high peak to see a marginal cost reduction for pulling down the full run average. Foundries may not be as product focused on the line. And how many see greater than 100 million unit runs? On QUANTA for determining Intel marginal cost of production jury is still out on whether there actually is a cost reduction per millimeter square of dice area from Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge. Increased Ivy dice suggest there should be on Intel’s standard integration rule of no more than 10% increase in wafer cost per generation, although that rule has been broken many times in the past. Then the question arises whether or not there will actually be demand for that volume of Ivy supply? Also knowing Sandy oversupplied still floods the channels. Ivy frequency distribution suggests Intel is fibbing on the ease of manufacturing trigate and this analysts suspects work overtime to make the sort above 2.4 GHz. Finally having accelerated at 32 nanometer from a commercial industrial art into 22 nanometers applied science what are the real RISK development costs over production alone which this analyst suggests are high. Intel annual financial won’t necessarily reveal the whole story where the books have been substantially cooked for a very long time. With a new generation of Haswell product in the mix, this analyst believes RISK production costs are more likely to rise than stay flat or decline. Mike Bruzzone Camp Marketing

3D Guy
User Rank
re: IBM, Intel face off at 22 nm
3D Guy   12/11/2012 4:32:05 PM
I think Mark Bohr's comments may be relevant to the super high volume CPUs Intel makes. They may not be applicable to the SOCs others make at TSMC and GloFo.

As data rates begin to move beyond 25 Gbps channels, new problems arise. Getting to 50 Gbps channels might not be possible with the traditional NRZ (2-level) signaling. PAM4 lets data rates double with only a small increase in channel bandwidth by sending two bits per symbol. But, it brings new measurement and analysis problems. Signal integrity sage Ransom Stephens will explain how PAM4 differs from NRZ and what to expect in design, measurement, and signal analysis.

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
David Ashton
Max The Magnificent
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...
The LTC®2348-18 is an 18-bit, low noise 8-channel ...
The LT®3042 is a high performance low dropout linear ...
Chwan-Jye Foo (C.J Foo), product marketing manager for ...
The LT®3752/LT3752-1 are current mode PWM controllers ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
Active balancing of series connected battery stacks exists ...
After a four-year absence, Infineon returns to Mobile World ...
A laptop’s 65-watt adapter can be made 6 times smaller and ...
An industry network should have device and data security at ...
The LTC2975 is a four-channel PMBus Power System Manager ...
In this video, a new high speed CMOS output comparator ...
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...