Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Or_Bach
User Rank
Author
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
Or_Bach   12/15/2012 4:04:14 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, As we been saying - Monolithic 3D is finally practical, so lets start to scale up, as scale down is no longer easy and full of benefits. And it looks that the first vendors to reach this conclusion are the NAND NV vendors, as had been presented across this IEDM.

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
resistion   12/14/2012 2:21:48 PM
NO RATINGS
He also mentioned immersion (193 nm not EUV) for 7 nm, though that did surprise me somewhat.

jeremybirch
User Rank
Author
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
jeremybirch   12/14/2012 12:08:09 PM
NO RATINGS
surely EUV is optical just a shorter wavelength source?! Perhaps they mean optical vs ebeam?

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
resistion   12/13/2012 12:54:10 AM
NO RATINGS
The problem for EUV is it has only one application space and that window is shrinking. In addition, the higher energy associated with its higher resolution wavelength produced some fundamental new effects, e.g., ionization, shot noise, etc., which will require more time to be grasped. On the other hand, 193 nm is more familiar, and the temptation to merely increase patterning steps is there. Although such increases will be more complex and costly, a detailed calculation, factoring in number of layers, volume, performance, power, etc. is needed to determine the overall cost impact to the particular product. There won't be a unique "right" answer unfortunately. But as you implied, leakage gets worse, and interconnect performance will also get worse. So a breakout from this trend is needed, soon.

green_is_now
User Rank
Author
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
green_is_now   12/13/2012 12:36:34 AM
NO RATINGS
What is the performance/leakage penalty at a given feature size for a given available wavelength? 193nm? 13.5nm? If EUV allows feature shrink without performance/leakage penalty compared to UV used now for comperable cost EUV wins hands down. Chasing moores law min feature size only and not performance/leakage metrics is not a solution

green_is_now
User Rank
Author
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
green_is_now   12/13/2012 12:09:48 AM
NO RATINGS
The facts are in process shrink below 1/10th of wavelength will require multiple patterning. where increased cost of EUV equipment break even with double, triple patterning costs still being played out with rapid development in the EUV space. If they would just hire me it could go much faster. :)

green_is_now
User Rank
Author
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
green_is_now   12/13/2012 12:03:43 AM
NO RATINGS
once upon a time...UV lithography impossible...

resistion
User Rank
Author
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
resistion   12/12/2012 2:56:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Remember to heed the warning of node renaming.

unknown multiplier
User Rank
Author
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
unknown multiplier   12/12/2012 2:55:16 PM
NO RATINGS
GlobalFoundries already gave up on EUV it seems: http://semimd.com/blog/2012/12/11/globalfoundries-accelerates-10nm-process/ “10nm will be optical,” he said. “We have evidence that we can do 7nm with immersion.”

sprite0022
User Rank
Author
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
sprite0022   12/12/2012 3:37:44 AM
NO RATINGS
stop argument, time to place your bet now. life is full of gambling, ultrabook, android, who knows what ll happen just jump...

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Radio
LATEST ARCHIVED BROADCAST

What are the engineering and design challenges in creating successful IoT devices? These devices are usually small, resource-constrained electronics designed to sense, collect, send, and/or interpret data. Some of the devices need to be smart enough to act upon data in real time, 24/7. Specifically the guests will discuss sensors, security, and lessons from IoT deployments.

Brought to you by:

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
Most Recent Comments
VicVat
 
dt_hayden
 
Max The Magnificent
 
Max The Magnificent
 
realjjj
 
DeeJee0
 
barenzunge
 
barenzunge
 
fragro
Like Us on Facebook
Special Video Section
With design sizes expected to increase by 5X through 2020, ...
01:48
Linear Technology’s LT8330 and LT8331, two Low Quiescent ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
LED lighting is an important feature in today’s and future ...
05:27
The LT8602 has two high voltage buck regulators with an ...
05:18
Silego Technology’s highly versatile Mixed-signal GreenPAK ...
The quality and reliability of Mill-Max's two-piece ...
01:34
Why the multicopter? It has every thing in it. 58 of ...
Security is important in all parts of the IoT chain, ...
Infineon explains their philosophy and why the multicopter ...
The LTC4282 Hot SwapTM controller allows a board to be ...
This video highlights the Zynq® UltraScale+™ MPSoC, and sho...
Homeowners may soon be able to store the energy generated ...
The LTC®6363 is a low power, low noise, fully differential ...
See the Virtex® UltraScale+™ FPGA with 32.75G backplane ...
Vincent Ching, applications engineer at Avago Technologies, ...
The LT®6375 is a unity-gain difference amplifier which ...
The LTC®4015 is a complete synchronous buck controller/ ...
10:35
The LTC®2983 measures a wide variety of temperature sensors ...
The LTC®3886 is a dual PolyPhase DC/DC synchronous ...