Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Or_Bach
User Rank
Rookie
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
Or_Bach   12/15/2012 4:04:14 AM
NO RATINGS
Yes, As we been saying - Monolithic 3D is finally practical, so lets start to scale up, as scale down is no longer easy and full of benefits. And it looks that the first vendors to reach this conclusion are the NAND NV vendors, as had been presented across this IEDM.

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
resistion   12/14/2012 2:21:48 PM
NO RATINGS
He also mentioned immersion (193 nm not EUV) for 7 nm, though that did surprise me somewhat.

jeremybirch
User Rank
CEO
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
jeremybirch   12/14/2012 12:08:09 PM
NO RATINGS
surely EUV is optical just a shorter wavelength source?! Perhaps they mean optical vs ebeam?

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
resistion   12/13/2012 12:54:10 AM
NO RATINGS
The problem for EUV is it has only one application space and that window is shrinking. In addition, the higher energy associated with its higher resolution wavelength produced some fundamental new effects, e.g., ionization, shot noise, etc., which will require more time to be grasped. On the other hand, 193 nm is more familiar, and the temptation to merely increase patterning steps is there. Although such increases will be more complex and costly, a detailed calculation, factoring in number of layers, volume, performance, power, etc. is needed to determine the overall cost impact to the particular product. There won't be a unique "right" answer unfortunately. But as you implied, leakage gets worse, and interconnect performance will also get worse. So a breakout from this trend is needed, soon.

green_is_now
User Rank
CEO
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
green_is_now   12/13/2012 12:36:34 AM
NO RATINGS
What is the performance/leakage penalty at a given feature size for a given available wavelength? 193nm? 13.5nm? If EUV allows feature shrink without performance/leakage penalty compared to UV used now for comperable cost EUV wins hands down. Chasing moores law min feature size only and not performance/leakage metrics is not a solution

green_is_now
User Rank
CEO
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
green_is_now   12/13/2012 12:09:48 AM
NO RATINGS
The facts are in process shrink below 1/10th of wavelength will require multiple patterning. where increased cost of EUV equipment break even with double, triple patterning costs still being played out with rapid development in the EUV space. If they would just hire me it could go much faster. :)

green_is_now
User Rank
CEO
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
green_is_now   12/13/2012 12:03:43 AM
NO RATINGS
once upon a time...UV lithography impossible...

resistion
User Rank
CEO
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
resistion   12/12/2012 2:56:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Remember to heed the warning of node renaming.

unknown multiplier
User Rank
Rookie
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
unknown multiplier   12/12/2012 2:55:16 PM
NO RATINGS
GlobalFoundries already gave up on EUV it seems: http://semimd.com/blog/2012/12/11/globalfoundries-accelerates-10nm-process/ “10nm will be optical,” he said. “We have evidence that we can do 7nm with immersion.”

sprite0022
User Rank
Manager
re: Moore’s Law seen hitting big bump at 14 nm
sprite0022   12/12/2012 3:37:44 AM
NO RATINGS
stop argument, time to place your bet now. life is full of gambling, ultrabook, android, who knows what ll happen just jump...

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Feast Your Orbs on My Jiggly Exercise Machine
Max Maxfield
50 comments
Last weekend, I was chatting with my mother on the phone. She's all excited that I'm coming over to visit for a week in November. "I'll be seeing you in only seven weeks," she trilled ...

latest comment kfield Toy....or agony? :-)
Glen Chenier

Missing Datasheet Details Can Cause Problems
Glen Chenier
3 comments
It is often said that "the devil is in the details." All too often those details are hidden deep within a datasheet, where you can easily overlook them. When a datasheet reference circuit ...

David Blaza

RadioShack: The End Is Nigh!
David Blaza
123 comments
I'm feeling a little nostalgic today as I read about what looks like the imminent demise of RadioShack, at least as we currently know it. An old ubiquitous cartoon image popped into my ...

Larry Desjardin

Engineers Should Study Finance: 5 Reasons Why
Larry Desjardin
47 comments
I'm a big proponent of engineers learning financial basics. Why? Because engineers are making decisions all the time, in multiple ways. Having a good financial understanding guides these ...

Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)