Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 2
Ogemaniac
User Rank
Manager
re: The 'ponderous chain' that keeps jobs overseas
Ogemaniac   12/26/2012 8:39:07 AM
NO RATINGS
"What motivates companies is always going to be to minimize costs and maximize revenues." And that virtually always involves: 1: Finding ways to externalize costs such as pollution 2: Finding ways to pay less than living wages, so that your workers's basic needs have to be subsidized by government 3: Finding ways to buy regulations favorable to you and bad for your competition 4: Finding ways to latch onto the government teat directly by demanding cash or other goodies for not moving just across the border And btw, "companies" do not have motivations. Managers do. And what motivates them is grabbing as much money as they can, as fast as they can. This often has only minimal connection of what is in the best interest of the company they are running, which in turn has little connection to what is best for society due to the all of the reasons I mentioned above. There is precisely zero reason to believe that managers' decisions and society-wide optimization are at all related, given all of the failures of free market theory that lie between them.

Traces
User Rank
Rookie
re: The 'ponderous chain' that keeps jobs overseas
Traces   12/24/2012 11:25:27 AM
NO RATINGS
Oh, for sure US insourcing isn't the only answer. Supply chains are like elephants: slow to start up, slow to change direction, and very slow to stop. Momentum alone will keep manufacturing going in China for at least the next half decade. After that, a lion's share of manufacturing will go to even cheaper Asian countries, but some will come back to the US. For Apple, in particular, I believe that Tim Cook has drunk too much of the China Kool-Aid and IS only insourcing for PR. But I also think it's obvious that an increasing amount of people view synergistic local manufacturing enabled by cheap ubiquitous robotics as the New, New Thing.

sprite0022
User Rank
Manager
re: The 'ponderous chain' that keeps jobs overseas
sprite0022   12/24/2012 1:39:47 AM
NO RATINGS
to bring manufacture back to US. 1 thing you all can do is build a singapore style industry area. (call it thrifty city etc.) where ppl comute with public transportation, live in high rise... US walmart employees are striking since they can't pay for their lunch with their $1800 monthly salary, this is the true problem.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: The 'ponderous chain' that keeps jobs overseas
Bert22306   12/24/2012 12:21:24 AM
NO RATINGS
First, I think you're forgetting that the Apple decision to bring SOME manufacturing back stateside is merely a token gesture. It's not for iPads or iPhones, for example. So clearly, not that much has changed in the cost equations they see, at any rate. It was some undisclosed fraction of high-end Macs. Hardly their bread and butter. And sure, in time costs change. No one is denying that. The simple fact is, the article did not discuss the numbers at all. What motivates companies is always going to be to minimize costs and maximize revenues. The distance traveled by products to US markets in particular is hardly all there is to this. For one, the US is not the only market in the world. For another, if it's cheaper in spite of transportation costs, it's still cheaper. So look at the numbers, at why it's cheaper, at the state of the art in automated manufacturing, and so on, using real numbers, so the real tradeoffs can be seen.

Traces
User Rank
Rookie
re: The 'ponderous chain' that keeps jobs overseas
Traces   12/22/2012 11:04:59 PM
NO RATINGS
For those of you without any time in business school (my minor while getting my EE masters), let me clarify a few things about business decisions: 1. Management types are especially prone to fads, mainly because many of their decisions are only partially quantifiable. 2. Offshoring, in particular, seemed like a great idea when gas was extremely cheap, chinese labor rates were extremely low, design cycles were extremely long, all businesses were thought to operate in a strict hierarchal manner (similar to the military or IBM in the 1950's), and all manufacturing that had to be done was transplanting well-worn processes from US soil to Chinese. 3. So, in regards to Bert's question "What changed...to cause any manufacturing to return stateside...?" I would provide the obvious answer: the entire world has changed. Every single justification for outsourcing manufacturing to China initially is no longer valid. Perhaps there are newer justifications for continuing to outsource, but I'm not aware of any yet. 4. Moreover, we're not where we were in 1985. We need to come up with new manufacturing processes, and provide a feedback loop to the designers to improve the product. Very hard to do across the ocean. 5. Moreover, businesses don't operate the way they used to. IBM-style command-and-control structures have given way to Scrum and Extreme Programming reiterative styles. Constant feedback and reiteration is becoming the norm, and this requires quick and meaningful feedback to make work. 6. Moreover, six weeks in a container ship probably works for a white goods with a five-year lifecycle, but surely doesn't work for cellphones with a six month lifecycle. 7. And, finally, we starting to enter an era of cheap, ubiquitous, and easy to program robots, which will render labor costs largely moot, anyway.

bobzz0
User Rank
Manager
re: The 'ponderous chain' that keeps jobs overseas
bobzz0   12/22/2012 9:32:43 AM
NO RATINGS
wow just wow

sprite0022
User Rank
Manager
re: The 'ponderous chain' that keeps jobs overseas
sprite0022   12/21/2012 5:06:36 AM
NO RATINGS
u missed sth here. sensata definitly got customer in china as well, by moving to china it can serve it's chinese customers better which is a plus you forget to mention. Just as chinese made Fender guitars, many of them sold locally.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: The 'ponderous chain' that keeps jobs overseas
Bert22306   12/20/2012 10:12:51 PM
NO RATINGS
But the words don't hint at the numbers that cause the changes in supply chain to begin with. If the words don't support the decisions the bean-counters made, it's only because the words used aren't quantitiative enough. Look at the bottom line. Distance between manufacturing and consumption, simply put, is not all there is to the equation. It's just one small aspect of what has to be compared. What changed, at Apple, to cause any manufacturing to return stateside at all? As far as I can tell, only political posturing changed. They still want this super cheap and mostly manual manufacturing process, because they still need/want to be able to change their product design quickly. Without paying the price that would have to be paid with a highly automated manufacturing facility. Any of that changed suddenly? I mean, or is Foxconn quoting much higher costs to Apple, to cause this change of heart? Doubtful. The macroeconomic tradeoff arguments, e.g. other related support jobs in the region that are created if manufacturing stays home, are NOT Apple's concern. Companies deal in a microeconomic reality. That's how they survive until tomorrow.

me3
User Rank
Rookie
re: The 'ponderous chain' that keeps jobs overseas
me3   12/20/2012 4:27:23 PM
NO RATINGS
"The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains." There you go. See Ma, it really happens.

george.leopold
User Rank
Rookie
re: The 'ponderous chain' that keeps jobs overseas
george.leopold   12/20/2012 3:08:44 PM
NO RATINGS
Business! Mankind was my business!

<<   <   Page 2 / 2


Top Comments of the Week
Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Recommended Reads From the Engineer's Bookshelf
Max Maxfield
2 comments
I'm not sure if I read more than most folks or not, but I do I know that I spend quite a lot of time reading. I hate to be idle, so I always have a book or two somewhere about my person -- ...

Aubrey Kagan

Have You Ever Been Blindsided by Your Own Design?
Aubrey Kagan
37 comments
I recently read GCHQ: The uncensored story of Britain's most sensitive intelligence agency by Richard J. Aldrich. The Government Communication Headquarters (GCHQ), Britain's equivalent of ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
2 comments
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
15 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Special Video Section
The LT8640 is a 42V, 5A synchronous step-down regulator ...
The LTC2000 high-speed DAC has low noise and excellent ...
How do you protect the load and ensure output continues to ...
General-purpose DACs have applications in instrumentation, ...
Linear Technology demonstrates its latest measurement ...
10:29
Demos from Maxim Integrated at Electronica 2014 show ...
Bosch CEO Stefan Finkbeiner shows off latest combo and ...
STMicroelectronics demoed this simple gesture control ...
Keysight shows you what signals lurk in real-time at 510MHz ...
TE Connectivity's clear-plastic, full-size model car shows ...
Why culture makes Linear Tech a winner.
Recently formed Architects of Modern Power consortium ...
Specially modified Corvette C7 Stingray responds to ex Indy ...
Avago’s ACPL-K30T is the first solid-state driver qualified ...
NXP launches its line of multi-gate, multifunction, ...
Doug Bailey, VP of marketing at Power Integrations, gives a ...
See how to ease software bring-up with DesignWare IP ...
DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits enable fast software ...
This video explores the LT3086, a new member of our LDO+ ...
In today’s modern electronic systems, the need for power ...