Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Paul A. Clayton
User Rank
CEO
re: GravityLight – What a GREAT idea!
Paul A. Clayton   1/4/2013 8:29:28 PM
NO RATINGS
There was an article on this at The Register a few weeks ago: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/12/deciwatt_gravity_light/ One advantage of this device is that, other than the LEDs (I think), it is relatively low tech and could be mostly manufactured or at least assembled locally (an economic advantage, not just a hand-out but partly a hand-up) and quite possibly maintained/repaired locally. I still think that the child-powered (merry-go-round) water well pumps are a little more clever in terms of exploiting an abundant energy source and providing fun.

Steven.Herrrick
User Rank
Rookie
re: GravityLight – What a GREAT idea!
Steven.Herrrick   1/5/2013 2:30:25 AM
NO RATINGS
Has someone done the math on this? a 20 pound bag lifted 5 feet has 100 foot-pounds of potential energy. At an efficiency of 20%, how long will a 20ma LED provide light?

RWatkins
User Rank
Rookie
re: GravityLight – What a GREAT idea!
RWatkins   1/6/2013 11:02:00 PM
NO RATINGS
Well, based on the calculator at http://convert-to.com/159/energy-units.html 100 ft-lb = 135.58 J, and by my calculations a 3V LED powered by a 100% efficient generator that draws 20 mA will stay lit for 37.7 minutes. I would estimate for the 3-LED system shown with a 50% efficient power conversion system would give about 6 minutes of light per 5 foot 100 pound lift. That is some big bag to hold 100 lb. The Gravity Light web page talks about a 20-pound weight, and says 18 to 30 minutes of light output per lift. I agree something seems a little off...

ost0
User Rank
CEO
re: GravityLight – What a GREAT idea!
ost0   1/7/2013 8:26:47 AM
NO RATINGS
Simple and Genious! :)

ost0
User Rank
CEO
re: GravityLight – What a GREAT idea!
ost0   1/7/2013 8:35:43 AM
NO RATINGS
In total darkness, you dont need 3 led's at 20mA.. I'm pretty sure 3 leds at 20mA would blind you. It would be more useful to get this amount of light spread on a large area, but that is a different challenge. Dont forget to compare it to the current alternative, not to a modern flashlight.

Ralph E_#1
User Rank
Rookie
re: GravityLight – What a GREAT idea!
Ralph E_#1   1/7/2013 5:02:29 PM
NO RATINGS
Hello Max, Nice going. I think you just cost me $50.00. :-) Just too good an investment to pass up. Also, I want one to play with. Cheers, Ralph

GerardS
User Rank
Rookie
re: GravityLight – What a GREAT idea!
GerardS   1/9/2013 8:35:56 AM
NO RATINGS
I feel the term Gravity Light is a bit mis-leading. Indeed, this light is powered by burning of bio-mass - the difference being that the bio-mass must comply to human nutritional standards and is burnt inside a human body. While this may look as an advantage in obesity-ridden countries like USA or Western Europe, I feel this may be look quite different for those countries which are currently using kerosene-lamps or open fires for lighting ..

Elukac
User Rank
Rookie
re: GravityLight – What a GREAT idea!
Elukac   1/9/2013 1:19:13 PM
NO RATINGS
Pulsing the LED (at a high enough freq to avoid flickering) will extend the duration for the same amount of energy.

IDontUseTheForumSoWhyAmIForc
User Rank
Rookie
re: GravityLight – What a GREAT idea!
IDontUseTheForumSoWhyAmIForc   1/9/2013 3:07:21 PM
NO RATINGS
At first glance, it reminded me of a cuckoo clock and the weight mechanism that drives it. The idea is so deceptively simple that it makes me wonder why I didn't think of it. And it's rechargeable too (in a convoluted lifting soft of way). Brilliant! While the principle is not innovative, using it for lighting is. Expect some sort of spin-off to take advantage of naturally occurring forces instead of using human energy ... tidal and air pressure changes come to mind, or perhaps the Seebeck effect could be used when day changes to night.

comuller
User Rank
Rookie
re: GravityLight – What a GREAT idea!
comuller   1/10/2013 12:27:22 AM
NO RATINGS
Nothing new, look at this project: http://www.core77.com/competitions/greenergadgets/projects/4306/ It never made it to production, reasons outlined above. Please note, that the "Gravity Light' people won't say anything about the energy generated by the device (other than it won't charge an iPhone). It don't doubt that it will generate some light, but whether this is enough to allow people to read is more than questionable.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>


Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
8 comments
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
12 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).