Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>
docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
re: CES: Too many cooks dumbing down smart TV?
docdivakar   1/9/2013 7:36:09 PM
NO RATINGS
@Servase: I agree a remote is faster... my point being (to the appliance makers) don't make things unnecessarily complex. If so many features are crammed into a remote and consumers are expected to 'learn' and adapt to those, then keep those expectations low! As Duane comments below, a good majority could not set the clock on their VCRs! Gesture and speech-based control today is still primitive. Give it time, they will improve to the point of getting rid of remotes. I hope I live long enough to have a holodeck in my house -that would be truly an immersive experience! MP Divakar

voice75
User Rank
Rookie
re: CES: Too many cooks dumbing down smart TV?
voice75   1/9/2013 7:20:31 PM
NO RATINGS
I just think why not just make TV kernel like smart phone core with a super big screen. Let user figure out what kind of content service they want to install and see on the TV.

Duane Benson
User Rank
Blogger
re: CES: Too many cooks dumbing down smart TV?
Duane Benson   1/9/2013 6:22:56 PM
NO RATINGS
Sometimes I wonder if the manufacturers consider the majority buyer when decking out TVs with all of these features. The audience of EE-Times may appreciate web access, apps and a remote with a full keyboard on it. In the context of consumer electronics, however, "smart" should mean the the device is smart, not that the user has to be smart. When VCRs (video cassette recorders for you youngsters) were in every house, the running joke was that no one could program them and most of them spent their days with "12:00" blinking on the front panel, indicating that the clock hadn't even been set. With a user interface track record like that, I don't expect so called "smart" TV's to gain any more acceptance than 3D TVs have.

Servase
User Rank
Rookie
re: CES: Too many cooks dumbing down smart TV?
Servase   1/9/2013 6:22:08 PM
NO RATINGS
Uggh, just uggh. Until these smart TV's have i3's embedded and run XBMC as the default I'm just not interested. Gesture and voice control? A remote is faster, more accurate and a hell of a lot easier for me to program. Streamed gaming services are interesting but my Steam account is better. I have a smart TV now and the only time I use the "smart" features is when I press the wrong button on my Harmony remote.

docdivakar
User Rank
CEO
re: CES: Too many cooks dumbing down smart TV?
docdivakar   1/9/2013 6:04:42 PM
NO RATINGS
My question to LG Electronics' CTO Scott Ahn (who says “Smart TVs have many smart features. But the way consumers interact with SmartTV isn’t smart.”) would be: why not get rid of the remote for SmartTV altogether? If your TV is so smart, has built-in camera, why not implement gesture-based and speech-based commands? While you are there, implement facial recognition so I can train my SmartTV to differentiate my commands to those of my kids. MP Divakar

markwrob
User Rank
Rookie
re: CES: Too many cooks dumbing down smart TV?
markwrob   1/9/2013 4:51:05 PM
NO RATINGS
Whatever remote comes with a smart TV, hopefully the makers allow folks to program them with an app on their smart phones too.

marcos83
User Rank
Rookie
re: CES: Too many cooks dumbing down smart TV?
marcos83   1/9/2013 10:40:32 AM
NO RATINGS
I have an Xbox, Samsung Smart TV and an Apple TV box. I work abroad and rely on a broadband connection to view TV programs. I find all these devices are too limited in what you can watch. Xbox have the right idea with its 24 hour baseball channel but so far that's about it. There are hardly any stations allowing access through the Smart TV.

Yog-Sothoth
User Rank
Freelancer
re: CES: Too many cooks dumbing down smart TV?
Yog-Sothoth   1/9/2013 2:37:42 AM
NO RATINGS
Is that LG 'Magic Remote' ugly like something out of the 1970's, or is it just plain ugly? Yuck!

MemoryLeak
User Rank
Rookie
re: CES: Too many cooks dumbing down smart TV?
MemoryLeak   1/9/2013 12:17:16 AM
NO RATINGS
Get this right, then the vastly more difficult task of coming up with something worth watching.

Bert22306
User Rank
CEO
re: CES: Too many cooks dumbing down smart TV?
Bert22306   1/8/2013 9:03:06 PM
NO RATINGS
Perhaps I misunderstand what the word "platforms" referred to, in the quote. I took it to mean the smart TVs themselves. If, instead, it refers to Web sites that aggregate TV content, like Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, iTunes, YouTube, the cable and satellite companies themselves, and a long list of other more obscure sites that already exist, then I would agree. Just making the point that there is no lack of content aggregation on the Internet already. So there's no reason to make it sound like this still neeeds to happen.

<<   <   Page 2 / 3   >   >>


Flash Poll
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Want to Present a Paper at ESC Boston 2015?
Max Maxfield
Post a comment
I tell you, I need more hours in each day. If I was having any more fun, there would have to be two of me to handle it all. For example, I just heard that I'm going to be both a speaker ...

Martin Rowe

No 2014 Punkin Chunkin, What Will You Do?
Martin Rowe
Post a comment
American Thanksgiving is next week, and while some people watch (American) football all day, the real competition on TV has become Punkin Chunkin. But there will be no Punkin Chunkin on TV ...

Rich Quinnell

Making the Grade in Industrial Design
Rich Quinnell
9 comments
As every developer knows, there are the paper specifications for a product design, and then there are the real requirements. The paper specs are dry, bland, and rigidly numeric, making ...

Martin Rowe

Book Review: Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design
Martin Rowe
1 Comment
Controlling Radiated Emissions by Design, Third Edition, by Michel Mardiguian. Contributions by Donald L. Sweeney and Roger Swanberg. List price: $89.99 (e-book), $119 (hardcover).