Design Con 2015
Breaking News
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
docdivakar
User Rank
Manager
re: UMC copper process targets power management ICs
docdivakar   2/21/2013 10:55:23 PM
NO RATINGS
Kris, this is about a decade-old technology developed by TI (was using 15micron Cu back then) and was used in its Swift group of Power Management products. The TPS54672 (with integrated MOSFETs) used a 0.8um BiCMOS process in a TSSOP PowerPAD package and the die used thick Cu in an RDL process which was done typically in a backend fab in those days. I believe the process technology was developed by Unitive with TI's active participation (Unitive has since been a part of Amkor). Since the Swift product days, the backend metallization for thick Cu has further improved. The article doesn't mention about patent claims TI had that prevented a number of other PMIC companies from using this technology. MP Divakar

Clif Tsai
User Rank
Rookie
re: UMC copper process targets power management ICs
Clif Tsai   1/17/2013 8:50:45 PM
NO RATINGS
Hope the wafer-packaging foundry collaboration will be smart enough to create a robust interconnect system using Cu wire/bump to resolve some of the Cu-based interconnect issues in assembly process and reliability.

Kresearch
User Rank
Rookie
re: UMC copper process targets power management ICs
Kresearch   1/16/2013 8:56:51 PM
NO RATINGS
It is just a marketing tactic to combine UMC(wafer Foundry) and Chipbond(Bumping house) services. Solution would be like typical RDL process. Anything new? It seems not.

Peter Clarke
User Rank
Blogger
re: UMC copper process targets power management ICs
Peter Clarke   1/16/2013 6:45:18 PM
NO RATINGS
Well copper is highly contaminating in a fab, so I suspect that UMC/Chipbond are plating copper on to a die as final metal layer step, possibly out of the fab. So then the question is one of desiging PMICs for greater current and thermal performance and which conventional BCD processes you apply the thick-copper plating.

krisi
User Rank
CEO
re: UMC copper process targets power management ICs
krisi   1/16/2013 3:37:54 PM
NO RATINGS
20% lower resistance doesn't sound like much...I am surprised that would developed a special process option for this...why not use it across the board?



Flash Poll
Top Comments of the Week
Like Us on Facebook
EE Times on Twitter
EE Times Twitter Feed

Datasheets.com Parts Search

185 million searchable parts
(please enter a part number or hit search to begin)
EE Life
Frankenstein's Fix, Teardowns, Sideshows, Design Contests, Reader Content & More
Max Maxfield

Are Today's Designs Bound by the Constraints of Yesteryear?
Max Maxfield
25 comments
As part of my ongoing Pedagogical and Phantasmagorical Inamorata Prognostication Engine project (try saying that 10 times quickly), I'm working with Jason Dueck from Instrument Meter ...

Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock

Jolt Awards: The Best Books
Jolt Judges and Andrew Binstock
1 Comment
As we do every year, Dr. Dobb's recognizes the best books of the last 12 months via the Jolt Awards -- our cycle of product awards given out every two months in each of six categories. No ...

Engineering Investigations

Air Conditioner Falls From Window, Still Works
Engineering Investigations
2 comments
It's autumn in New England. The leaves are turning to red, orange, and gold, my roses are in their second bloom, and it's time to remove the air conditioner from the window. On September ...

David Blaza

The Other Tesla
David Blaza
5 comments
I find myself going to Kickstarter and Indiegogo on a regular basis these days because they have become real innovation marketplaces. As far as I'm concerned, this is where a lot of cool ...